Cloning of humans is inevitable in the very near future. Would you consider a clone of self or loved one?

Question

I'm a Biochemist and one of the first reserach papers I wrote in undergrad school was on cloning in 1992. When my parents passed away in 1993, I really thought about saving their DNA in hopes of being able to clone them one day (this was 3.5 yrs before Dolly). Needless to say, I thought against it because of realization that death is part of life, but would you consider cloning a loved one (child, parent, lover, friend), if it was legal, economically feasable and the clone had a very high chance of living a normal and healthy life?

Answer 1

An intresting question, and I'm sure there will be many intresting answers, but here's mine:

No, I would not clone myself nor any loved ones..because not only as you said yourself, death is part of life (as ironic as it sounds), but they wouldn't be the same person, anyway. Granted, I don't know much about the way it works, but I think that just because say, as example, your best friend was a nice lady, that doesn't mean she didn't have a mean streak in her, and perhaps, if she was cloned, it's possible her clone would take on the crueler side of her personality.
But even if they acted the exact same way, they still are not the same person. They're not the same person who let you cry on their shoulder when you were sad, or gave you the best birthday party, or even the same person you fought with. It just wouldn't be the same, even if it was...if that even makes sense.

I'm curious to see other's answers now.

Answer 2

Those are amongst the factors (ethics,legality,health) that are preventing the use of the technology..but why would You "bring back" a person who meant so much to You? Unless the clone had the same life experiences,and relationships with You, at best You'd have someone who just resembled them..a body double.It would be a different person.
What they learned from Dolly,among other things,was that creating an adult clone gave it the systemic problems of the aging Donor..giving a new body the problems of the old one.
At present,recreating a person who's no longer around from genetic material is still science fiction..I enjoy a scifi yarn...check out Heinlein's "Methuselah's Children" and "The cat who walks through walls" for his take on the use of cloning...

Answer 3

I don't believe in cloning people. I'm still not really sure if God exists or not, but I definitely know I don't want to play Him. However, I am for cloning in the sense of regeneration of organs and such. Say, I need a kidney transplant. Now, there are other type A+ people out there, but the chance of me finding one in time and my body accepting their kidney isn't 100%. However, if I had a clone of my own kidney, it could be replaced with little or no problems.
But, therein lies its own problem. If I had kidney failure in my original kidney, and it was cloned, won't the cloned one fail too? It's a hard issue.
I don't believe the world should end up like in the movie Gattica where you can select eye color, hair color, etc. A world where people without 20/20 vision and the perfect build is not one in which I wish to live.

Answer 4

besides to 'spare' factors for the residing yet another beneficial result may well be obtainable. If a clone may well be made out of a guy or woman who's clever, good-looking(or beautiful), athletic, long lived, with a chuffed character, and no genetic information of unusual ailments, it actual could properly be a turnaround for ordinary human well-being. it would seem that the genetic potential, with all the super treatments obtainable, there is an interruption of the determination technique. And a everyday advance in defective genetic types. including nearsightedness, diabetes, inadequate pelvis requiring as much as 25% of youngsters born basically by using C area, low IQ's, and so on. If this genetic progression have been practiced on a small scale and thoroughly voluntarily, it variety of feels in all likelihood that a gene pool of 'good' well-being must be performed with out too lots rigidity on all in contact.

Answer 5

No.
I don't like the idea to cloning human beings.. so frightening. Playing God. Are you God?
Yes, okay you may clone your loved ones, but then what?
They are only the same physically, but emotionally and mentally?

So I don't think clone ideas would bring your loved ones back to your life, whatsoever after they die. Maybe clone to animal is fine. But not to man. Because you will ONLY have the same physical things, but NOT the emotion and mental state of that person you cloned, won't you?
.

Answer 6

I would consider some kind of advanced form of regenerative resuscitation for the recently deceased (I have done research on this in the past and since moved on for unrelated reasons). Cloning humans (or any animal) is simply out of the question. Since you are a scientist, I don't need to explain to you what it would do to a society or an ecosystem if it became a common practice.

Answer 7

NO and not for relougous reasons either! i just think the world is over populated as it is!

what would be a great thing to do is to learn about is how you can clone parts of you for replacements example HEARTS clone my heart so when it starts to fail i can replace it and not wait in line for a giver...
or make up some cream that you can spread on your now missing arm so it can grow back!

Answer 8

No. I hate the idea of cloning. It seems beyond supernatural. The thought of having a clone of a loved one is better in theory than in truth.

Answer 9

i think you are lying...you talk like a 5th grader about cloning.

if you clone your parents, they will not be your parents...personality is very complex...they will only LOOK like your parents...there will be NO other similarity between your dead(im sorry) parents and the new babies youve cloned...

if that were enough you can pay someone to make you stuffed dolls(once again i dont imply any apathy for your loss)

Answer 10

no not people as the clone would not be the person i wanted ,i would clone a good dog .