when u take china,japan,korea ,vietenam,malasiya and singapore developed well compared to indian sub continent , even sub continent got their freedom in 1950's still they cant provide food for all the people.why.what is the big difference.
2006-12-07 02:21:35 · 4 answers · asked by kiran 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Your inclusion of China in your list of "well-developed" countries is mistaken. If you look at the real China and not just the China of the communist propaganda, you will see some serious poverty.
Japan and Korea have developed better than India because the government has been less involved in trying to control the economy. India has had a notoriously large (and corrupt) bureauacracy for more than 40 years. In the last few years this has been pared back significantly, with the result being very strong growth in the economy. To the extent that India continues this trend is the extent to which that growth will continue.
2006-12-07 02:27:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dregaron S 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
China and Vietnam are hardly "well developed."
With regard to Japan, South Korea, and Singapore, what do those have in common?
They're (1) Democracies, and (2) capitalist.
Thus a major key to improving life in the east is to spread democracy and capitalism.
2006-12-07 10:25:51 · answer #2 · answered by C = JD 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A lot has to do with government distribution and some has to do with the religion that makes it a sin to eat most animals so people starve in the streets with food all around them. There doesn't seem to be a dignity accorded to the human being in India which in other countries is something strongly agreed upon.
2006-12-07 10:27:29 · answer #3 · answered by Tapestry6 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Religion and the Fighting that ensues
2006-12-07 10:27:09 · answer #4 · answered by Lab Runner 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋