or would they bash and slander him calling the war on Japan "illegal"
2006-12-07 01:07:28 · 14 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's amazing how ignorant of history they are. They don't know, or they forget, that their hero FDR attacked Germany (which never attacked us) and put Japanese-American citizens in INTERNMENT CAMPS!
2000 died in the attck at Pear Harbor in 1 DAY. And now they whine because less than 3000 have died in 3 YEARS in Iraq.
Perception is reality. And if anybody has a "D" by their name (like FDR) then you can do no wrong, you can even put 100,000 citizens in INTERNMENT CAMPS. But if you have a "R" by your name (like Bush), then you are the Devil and can do no right. Liberals are the epitome of hypocrisy.
2006-12-07 01:24:32 · answer #1 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Liberals DID back Roosevelt, since he was a Democrat.
In fact, everybody did. When Pearl Harbor happened, it was without doubt that something needed to be done about Japan. They attacked us, so they had to pay.
Same with Afghanistan (sort of.) They harbored the people who attacked us, and that's where bin Laden was, so we went in and took care of them.
2006-12-07 01:16:54 · answer #2 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Roosevelt was a liberal and the whole country backed him. Now if instead of attacking Japan FDR would have attacked say China...
2006-12-07 10:48:23 · answer #3 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your Question inf errs that people can't have differences of opinion, this liberal thing we had no other choice after we were attacked. It's 2 bad you altar Conservative types of done enough 2 this country with your attitudes. Did you not pay attention 2 the Last Election. Stop the splinting of the people. Freedom of opinion without being attacked. Enough is Enough. If you feel that way you go and fight and if 2 old send your love one Sons & daughter Big Guy.
2006-12-07 01:14:48 · answer #4 · answered by silkieladyinthecity 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Funny you ask that question.
The liberals/Dems at the time supported the war and it was the conservatives who were the isolationists.
And many republican isolationists were German sympathizers and wanted us to stay out of the war. Charles Lindeberg was a prime example
I think you should go read a history before you post your moronic drivel.
2006-12-07 05:11:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since you are dragging up the past oh cool mule - He should of been hanged for not preventing Pearl Harbour or at least mounting a defence. He had the warning, the knowledge and the TIME.
I am the Fringe and if you live in the past you have no future.
2006-12-07 01:14:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually, at the time we had Democrats (liberal, but not as liberal
as today), Dixiecrat's (moderates) and Republicans. They all
backed Roosevelt.
There were detractors and we even had protesters.
Thank you very much, while you're up.
2006-12-07 01:14:18 · answer #7 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
in common words CONGRESS CAN declare conflict. THE PRESIDENT CAN positioned OUR FORCES INTO protection force action yet AFTER a chain era of time ought to GET CONGRESS'S APPROVAL TO proceed protection force action
2016-11-24 20:49:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
roosevelt planned the attack on pearl harbor because of his racism against the japanese people and to justify putting them into internment camps!
2006-12-07 01:15:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well said, Kent
2006-12-07 01:13:32 · answer #10 · answered by jcboyle 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋