Bush invade Iraq when our active duty troop strenght was only 500,000 men. He was advised by the military that it would take a force of 400,000 to bring law and order to post-Saddam Iraq.
Rather than reinstate the draft, Bush sought to train Iraqis as the needed security force. This approach has failed. Billions of dollars have been poured into Iraq, our equipment is quickly wearing out, and havoc in Iraq is spreading.
Do we have the backbone to do what is needed to bring law and order to Iraq? The people of Iraq cannot manage the country on their own unless law and order is established first. Without a stabilizing force, civil war will spread.
Invading Iraq was wrong, in my opinion. But, leaving the country in it's present state is also wrong. Winning the peace in Iraq will require reinstating the draft. Is America willing to do that, or tuck its tail and run?
2006-12-07
01:06:39
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Overt Operative
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
It's a false assumption that inceasing our troop levels in Iraq will increase the violence. The opposite is true. There is safety in numbers.
2006-12-07
01:19:05 ·
update #1