2006-12-07 00:53:35 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, he couldn't. America wouldn't allow Britain to come in and colonize Iraq or even begin to try, when we have put a good three and half or four years into doing it ourselves. It would be a crushing blow to our grotesquely bloated ego to have the UK or Britain come in and succeed at what we failed to do. Make no mistake, there is no war going on here. America is setting up to forcibly colonize and acquire the sovereign state of Iraq. This is Imperialism and that's the bottom line. We hired Saddam, then we fired him and began oppressing the Iraqi people in a more direct way. We instigated a civil war and aided it in every way we possibly could and we won't git our hands out of the cookie jar until Iraq can no longer stand on it's own government and begs us to let them in. It will be essentially the same crude yet effective political maneuver we used to establish the country and many others after WWI. And once more, it will provide an airtight alibi that makes it clear that we aren't stealing land and resources from an indigenous people, we're making a mutual transaction sanctioned by both sides.
2006-12-07 01:34:05 · answer #1 · answered by Rick R 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess he could cause the government is so unstable. As to if he should, that might not be a good idea. everytime the brits do that something bad happens
2006-12-07 08:57:34 · answer #2 · answered by Richard Cranium 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. The war is about freedom, not imperialism.
2006-12-07 08:57:44 · answer #3 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No and No. Stupid questions.
2006-12-07 08:56:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no!
2006-12-07 08:55:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋