In my situation, I have an 11 yr old and a 10 mth old. My baby would most definitely drown without my help, the 11 yr old might make it on her own. So I would have to help my youngest since he would have NO chance of survival on his own. But I think that would be the worst thing that could happen to a mother or father. I do not know that I could live with having to make that decision after the fact. I could not imagine life without both of my children.
2006-12-06 22:40:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by peach 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hey, you know, a woman from America had to make that choice. She saved the younger one. Amazingly, though, her other child managed to survive, too!
2006-12-06 22:24:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by mithril 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
It happened in Asia to a woman. I've seen on tv. She let the older child go and later they've found him alive. I can't even think about it.
2006-12-06 22:24:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by **** if i know 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Lucky I have only one child so I'll save my only boy!
2006-12-06 22:23:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
well in happens in the film Siophie's choice very good film.
2006-12-06 22:35:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by dancingwiththestars 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you grab the boy ... that way you have a chance at your family name living on
2006-12-06 22:22:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gummi Bear Devourer II 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
whichever is closer to my reach.
most logical.
2006-12-06 22:22:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mary Jane 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
PUSH ONE ... GO WITH THE OTHER ONE... I HAVE TOO!
2006-12-06 22:34:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
if its an option, i'd rather let both of THEM go and i die, if not, then well whoever is younger i guess - or maybe ....
aish.. i dunno.. i'd grab them both or leave them both...
aaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i dunno.. too tough a decision..
2006-12-06 22:25:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Condie 5
·
1⤊
1⤋