I disagree that the record of a meeting should include what was said - the important thing is to record the decision, not the debate. If someone feels so strongly about a decision going against them, then it is proper, at their request, to record that dissension. You should also record how a decision was arrived at, 'nem con', by a show of hands, on a poll, etc., in accordance with the particular constitution of the meeting being recorded.
Otherwise, as others have said, name of chairperson, list of attendees, apologies, minutes of last meeting, approval of those minutes, any matters arising, resolutions, date of next meeting.
2006-12-06 22:17:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by rdenig_male 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Record of attendees,
Minutes of previous meeting need to be signed off as truthful (by the chairman)
Record of anyone who has apologised as to not attending
Actions going forward and who is to be doing them
Any other Business (AOB) that came up from the meeting.
Date of next meeting
2006-12-06 22:06:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Previous meetings business, any resolutions made at last meeting, how many attended last meeting, new business, any plans made for group trips or outings, collection of dues, etc.
2006-12-06 22:15:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by golden rider 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The standard layout of minutes should include;
Attendees
Apologies
Matters arising
Updates
Date & time of next meeting.
Simple as that!
2006-12-06 22:19:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by loknights 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone that was present!
Unless it was more than 20! Then list the speakers, and any relevant replies from the attendees.
2006-12-06 22:06:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by puffy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who was there, who sent their apologies, what was said, what was agreed, what actions need to be taken as a result and by whom.
2006-12-06 22:06:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋