Should capital punishment be brought back in the uk?

Question

These days where there is a clear cut case with DNA proof, do you agree with me that pedo's and sex attackers and cold blooded murderers should be killed off? - we'd relieve the over crowded prisons and justice would be done.

Why try to re habilitate - it;s not worth it!

As a law obiding citezen, I feel that should I decide to go on the dole, sick or commit a crime I would be better off! -

Get the swines off the earth or let em walk free?

THE POINT I'M TRYING TO MAKE IS THAT ONLY WHEN IT IS A CLEAR CUT CASE! not as it was years ago and wrong people were hanged !

Answer 1

Of course. So should birching, whipping and caning in schools and I'm just the one to adminsister the punishments.

Answer 2

No, i think of that the possibility of executing somebody who's harmless isn't one i will justify to myself. that's incredibly perplexing to be one hundred% specific that somebody comitted against the regulation and previous resonable doubt does not seem specific sufficient in case you're conversing approximately killing somebody for some thing they could have executed. you besides mght run the possibility of short sighted executions interior the "warmth of the 2d" the place all of us is baying for blood with admire to specific case types the place the case won't have been investigated thoroughly because of the could get a rapid conviction. a minimum of with a reformatory sentence if the conviction is incorrect then the guy may well be released, a posthumous pardon isn't ok. I do whether have confidence that the justice equipment desires significant progression and that a sentence could be correct enforced in situations the place the convicted persons rights are constrained to fundamentals (food, shield) and not something greater. A punishment could be a punishment. yet another rapid element, DNA information isn't the be all and end all, that's incorrect and that's misinterpreted so the magnitude placed on it by using juries now days is slightly of a topic.

Answer 3

I read ya loud and clear, I understand the point u r trying to make.

DNA should not be totally relied on, no more than computors should. Some American states hold prisoners on death row for 10 years, just in case any more evidence comes to light, I think this would be a good idea.

I 90% agree with capital punishment after a long spell on death row. The 10% reservation I have is for those who are fitted up for a crime by governments, they would have the knowledge and technology to be able to do it.

Answer 4

Capital Punishment has NEVER worked as a deterrent to serious crimes being commited. It only acts as a means to an end.
DNA evidence is a sure factor in placing a person at the scene of a crime, but it is NOT 100% accurate 100% of the time.
Prisons were turned into "hotels" after do-gooders like Elizabeth Fry started to kick up about the conditions prisoners were having to endure.

Answer 5

Sounds like genetic cleansing. Is it why let people with a natural propensity for serious and violent crime breed into society?

Hasn't that been tried before?

Even if it worked, and did deter crime, I doubt it would be socially acceptable.

For some reason in Europe people always identify as much if not more with the perpetrator than the victim.

Answer 6

yes capital punishment should be brought back my way of thinking is if we did have the capital punishment the scum of this earth would think twice about rapeing and murdering innocent children/adults.the law is on their side in some ways, i.e- the little sentances these scumbags recieve,life should mean life,not 18 months in some cosy nick,with a pool table,the net,hot chocolate before bed and sky tv.

The scumbags are laughing at us,at the system,lets face it anyone recieving a setance does'nt have to pay bills,rent, buy food etc,does'nt even have the
hassle of finding a job......

Answer 7

Well, lots of venom in your question there! Unfortunately, not much logic.

The democracy with the most executions by far is the USA. It is also the place with the highest rate of homicide! From this we can see that state killing does not deter freelance killing.

Secondly, isn't it an odd response to say that you hate killing, and killers, and therefore you wish to kill them? Doesn't that make you a bit like they are?

Finally, if your feelings are feelings of vengeance, and you simply wish to kill a number of criminals to make you feel good, then don't talk about 'justice' because that is not really what you are concerned with...

Answer 8

Perhaps keeping them locked up forever is a greater punishment than death. In the case of people like Ian Huntley, his attempted suicide is often reported. The tragedy is often that too many murderers are not dealt with until it is too late.

Answer 9

Good point, if we hang them in CLEAR CUT CASES it would save the tax payer hundreds of thousands each and every year. Whats the point in paying to keep someone locked up for years then risk letting them back into society with no guarantee that they wont re offend

Answer 10

Yes. Then to give the naysayers peace of mind take an accurate reading of the murder rate before, then about 5 years after it is introduced and applied vigorously.
This ought to clear up any confusion as to whether or not ot deters murder.