What does everyone think of "Active non-violent pragmatic enlightened transcendental romantic individualistic Idealism"? does this combination of concepts give anyone the same spine tingles it gives me and what does anyone think it would look like fully defined? I know some terms are contradictory but only when takin individually not in a fused hybridization including only compatible elements. I believe this could be the best new approach to the complex, morally ambigious and confusing state of affairs in 21st centaury america.
2006-12-06
18:46:40
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Stan S
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy