English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Tigers are larger, definitely the Tiger!

2006-12-06 18:13:51 · answer #1 · answered by deepseaofblankets 5 · 0 1

those animal v animal fights typically do not have direct data for a balanced and precise result. and typically the position files and data does exist, the files is bias, distorted and relayed inaccurately as time passes. So what are we left with ? - comparing body structure... - power - Offensive and protective abilty - length/bulk i do not comprehend how you concluded that a Siberian tiger 'wins fingers down' hostile to an african lion ? For a commence, the size vast difference isn't as large as many believe. modern Siberian tigers are little larger than Bengal tigers, certainly northern Bengal tigers are being studied heavily and must be in competition to be as large as Siberian tigers. this is because of two causes - northern Bengal tigers are larger than their southern opposite numbers and modern Siberian tigers are literally not reaching the size of their historic opposite numbers - a element that ought to correctly be inferred from the Siberian Tiger initiatives findings... combine this with the variable length of the distinct african lion subspecies - the Barbary and Transvaal lions.are larger than lions of different realms interior africa (different subspecies). both one in each and every of those subspecies are very on the point of the size and weight of southern bengal tigers. So African lions are in truth in elementary words slightly smaller than maximum Bengal tigers. Lions stand slightly taller on the shoulder, tigers are longer and slightly heavier. Tigers are more advantageous robustly outfitted and function a larger degree of musculature. Little separates them in words of cranium, dogs and claw length. The lions mane ought to discover the money for it some safe practices, yet not in any respect must be deemed a determining element. you sometimes study that because male lions 'strive against for a residing' they're therfore more advantageous ferocious, able and adept at battling. properly it isn't any benefit - male tigers are each and each bit their equivalent in those regards. To finish, the parts that a tiger has benefit and/or benefit are... average length and weight, more advantageous musculature and a more advantageous robust construct. the in elementary words genuine benefit a lion has is the degree of safe practices afforded with techniques from its mane. On stability, i ought to finish an average benefit and majority win for the tiger, yet a human being strive against ought to bypass both way and remains almost continuously unpredictable.

2016-11-30 06:13:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

one on one, a tiger is far bigger than a lion, and so should be the favourite...also, I would think a lion is more of a team animal living in prides, while a tiger is better equipped hunting alone on its own, so a one to one might be loaded in favour of the tiger

2006-12-06 19:43:49 · answer #3 · answered by pravkas 2 · 1 1

Tiger!! (I have Asian pride like that.)

2006-12-06 18:14:39 · answer #4 · answered by Epsilon289 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers