Go to the FBI website and look at his profile. It states that he is wanted for some terrorist acts, but does not mention 9/11. When asked about this, the FBI was forced to admit they did not have the evidence. Knowing this why not look at more credible theories about 9/11
2006-12-06 17:41:45 · 8 answers · asked by Luke F 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted.htm, here is my source
2006-12-06 17:52:44 · update #1
sam sam, you can go to www.st911.org, it is great If you would rather watch a video check out 9/11 mysteries or loose change
2006-12-06 17:54:51 · update #2
hey arus gero, you have to be kidding me. Those sites are junk. have you read them, there are dozens of proven errrors in all of them. Unlike you I have read and studied both sides of the story. I could ask you a hundred questions that you could not answer and you act like there are not any problems with 9/11, you cannot be taken serously by anyone who has done research, so I encourage you to to look at the facts about 9/11?
2006-12-07 06:24:06 · update #3
Well, that's an interesting question! I have to admit, I fell for the explanation that our government leaders gave hook, line and sinker. Amazing! Where would I go for those 'more credible theories'?
Thanks!
2006-12-06 17:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by Goodmomma1 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The government knows alot more than they will ever let us know. What I want to know is with all the technology we have how is it that we cant find this guy? The courts system is all screwed up too. Everyday innocent people get convicted of crimes they didnt commit. Alot of the times its because they dont have the money to pay for the right attorney to represent them. Thats wrong. Whatever happened to justice?? Then there are times when people, DA, a judge, society, pretty much knows that a person is guilty. If someone cant find the evidence to prove and convict, they get off. Its a sad world we live in...
2006-12-06 17:59:21 · answer #2 · answered by zoelynn 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Oh My Gosh,Really YukYuk Yuk!!
2006-12-06 17:43:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yea, that's pretty pathetic in my opinion. I suppose that there is evidence on 9-11 and Saddam Hussein, huh???
2006-12-06 17:49:56 · answer #4 · answered by First Lady 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. I have heard that. Why not find and post a link to it.
2006-12-06 17:44:49 · answer #5 · answered by profile image 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its a shame that this happened.
2006-12-06 18:10:04 · answer #6 · answered by memolino2007@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow, i didint know that.
2006-12-06 18:20:10 · answer #7 · answered by honey bear 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
st911.org is a scam site run by moronic members with no credentials to comment on 9/11. so much that they've lost members due ot their own infighting
and no, he is not wanted for 9/11. Why? Because he HAS BEEN ASSOCIATED With other terroristic acts, so the need to charge him with 9/11 is just adding icing to the cake. Its not needed. Once capture, he would be put to death for previous crimes.
Debunking Sites:
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/
http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php
http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.jod911.com/
http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm
http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html
http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html
http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm
http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5782277
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://antitruther.blogspot.com/
http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php
Reports:
http://wtc.nist.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/
http://www.9-11commission.gov/
http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc-report/WTC_ch2.pdf
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/12/victim-capsule-flight77.htm
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article.cfm?archiveDate=10-07-01&storyID=7299
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285.PDF
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.asce.org/responds/
http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~astaneh/1-Services/Astaneh-Testimony%20Congress-March%206%20Final.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/defense/aviationnow_jumpstart.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3919613.stm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/25/attack/main501989.shtml
http://www.designnews.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA6363426&industryid=43653
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc04.pdf
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc08.pdf
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/embryriddle092101.html
http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925scene0925p2.asp
http://www.firehouse.com/news/2002/7/7_P911.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/11_APdc.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/norman.html
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28318-2005Apr5.html
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011220shanksville1220p2.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010925sledzik0925p3.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20011028flt93mainstoryp7.asp
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212800,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34211,00.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/index.htm
http://cryptome.sabotage.org/wtc-house.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Banaciski_Richard.txt
http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A13766-2001Sep11
http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archives/030127.asp
http://www.navytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-467181.php
http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20040225213523/http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usflight232380680sep23.story
http://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/techactv2005/ar2005_safety.html#fire
http://www.911myths.com/html/ntsb_release_august_22_2006.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june02/towers_5-1.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20031026101720/http://www.arabianews.org/english/article.cfm?qid=12&sid=6
http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/skyscrapers.pdf
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A19549-2001Sep24
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/M.A.Sweeney.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html
http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml
2006-12-06 18:11:52 · answer #8 · answered by arus.geo 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋