It's both. It's a subjective questions. Only the 'reader' can determine if something is 'better' or not. Each person answers it based on their perceptions and ideas.
2006-12-06 16:36:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by bionicbookworm 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
False. We have the gift of choice. There will always be a bad path that we can follow and learn what's there the hard way. Or we could follor the good path and not even think about what's on the other side. But the more good paths we go on, the more paths will appear and soon there will be a fork in the road.
2006-12-07 00:38:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
***********************************************
It's an opinion based on perspective.
Where ever there is a path........a path is a well traveled route, many have taken that route before you to wear it down enough to be noticeable. If you are walking through the woods lost and are trying to find your way out and you happen upon a path, ......there is a better way of finding your way out than what you have tried previously. In this case the better way is on the path.
If you are travelling through the woods exploring for the sake of being away from people and life's chaos and you happen upon a path, the path is not the better way. But into the woods is.
Finding a path is an undesireable encounter. In this case the better way is into the woods.
So it could be said that this statement is true. Just depends on your perspective.
*********************************************
2006-12-07 00:35:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fun Haver 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Truth or falsity has nothing to do with the statement. It is an opinion. A path infers a route that more than one person (or animal) has used -- it means a way that is well traveled, otherwise it would not be a path. Whether indeed there is a better "way" to go is up to the individual. Perhaps another route may be more scenic, more time consuming, more risky, less crowded...........that's not to say that it's a better way, eh?
2006-12-07 00:36:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by cranura 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure- it is true. The "path" is a proverbial message saying that others have gone this route, so there is no need to start cutting down trees and removing boulders and make a new path. That does not mean that it is the only way, there are many roads to enlightenment!
2006-12-07 00:48:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by ••Mott•• 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The answer is absolutely false. Why? Because it is a path period, it doesn't matter where it leads and it doesn't matter where you are going, it is we whom make the path harder or better, not the path itself. So it doesn't matter, take the step onto the path and make it seem how you want it to..... Shakespeare said "Life is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury.... signifying nothing" which is as true as one can find for words. So, go forth and walk, it won't matter unless you allow it to.... good luck, Jack
2006-12-07 00:39:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
True because a way needs a path. Of course the better depends upon the venturer.That didn't help, did it? Well, you can argue both ways. Have a great holiday.
2006-12-07 00:39:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by firestarter 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have really only heard of "When there is a will there is a way". Which means if you are strong enough to believe in a cause, you will find a way to achieve it.
When there's a path, there's a BETTER way:
Don't really know how to interpret that? Perhaps, if there's a solution to something, there must be other even better solutions also worth exploring?
Whatever that means!
2006-12-07 00:39:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by bluefossil 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
true, it's up to us to make the better way to get down the right path
2006-12-07 00:40:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by payne31535 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
in one sense, since there is an exception to every rule(even that one) no general statement is true in a total sense. the statement is out of context, but it may be saying the is always room for improvement, those improvements depend on your choices, belief and determination of goal. if these things exists in appropriate levels, then....yes
2006-12-07 00:41:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋