Why are some cities grow very big, like NYC, LA, Chicago and others stay medium or small?

Answer 1

All three cities you mention became major cities because they are transportation ports. New York also was where the majority of immigrants came through when the country was still developing. Los Angeles is the west coast hub for imports from overseas. Chicago was founded because it had access to the Mississippi River and the Great Lakes.

Now it's more about the opportunity, the cost of living/wages, etc. We aren't confined by the same needs we were 150 years ago, so in theory any small town could become huge if they could offer the incentive, opportunity, and money for people to come out. (a good example is that in the 1800s there weren't a lot of people settling out west until gold was struck in California, when suddenly there was a high demand for land, more jobs were created, towns were established, etc).

Answer 2

Cities with attractions grow, such as near water or rivers. Settlements in the plains of Iowa tend to stay small because they are boring!

Answer 3

most of those cities have a lot of immigrants and they have heard of those cities so thats where they want to go.. if more people heard about a city of medium size then tell more people and move their families there then it gets a bigger city and more people do that too also job opportunities help with poplulation

Answer 4

they have more oppertunity as far as jobs, schools so smaller cities do not have as many "things" to do. people are more then attractted to the big cities u know clubs concerts and sports events..

Answer 5

it is because larger cities offer larger opportunities.. people tend to flock where they think it offers best.. who the hell the person who does not want to live a comfortable life.. it's just like that...

Answer 6

First I might desire to ask myself some questions previously i will difficult. "Do i think of" opens up the vagueness of this question in the present day. permit's see, do i think of, I advise truly think of roughly issues? who're "others" to me? What do i think of is "basic"? If in any respect what do I evaluate the factor at which somebody is "examining my techniques?" maximum heavily, i might desire to settle on what the guy asking this question is attempting to get out of it. The question is being asked below the thought examining the techniques could be achieved. i visit then say that it relatively is achieved employing a style of procedures. None of those procedures contain extremely examining a persons' techniques. physique language, rigidity, the eyes, etc.. all play a roll in examining a techniques. To study a techniques, takes 2 human beings. consistently related to a individual it relatively is attempting to study a techniques. Plus, a individual that would decide for his or her techniques study, like a hungry little one; or a individual will possibly no longer decide for his or her techniques study; like a poker participant. For examining my techniques to be basic, i might desire to make it basic for my techniques to be study. think of of this like a interest of poker. expert gamers are professionals at examining minds, yet they're additionally professionals at combating their minds from being study. With all that for the duration of attention, i think of that MY techniques, for the main section is basic for powerfuble others to study if i'm caught with the help of marvel. If i do no longer decide for my techniques study, it relatively is a lot extra tricky for others to study. super question, very oftentimes going on ;-]