Afterall, he knew how to keep his country peaceful.
I don't think he or anyone else would do worse than Bush who has killed more Iraqi's than Saddam. Plus Saddam was once an ally.
2006-12-06 15:31:33 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Now wouldn't that be the most ironic turn of events in history. But I think the US will find another more "US friendly" dictator to take over Iraq and brutaly restore order (he won't have any WMDs to use on his own people).
2006-12-06 15:35:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yeah that is a great idea. He could revert his jails back for genital torture and rape rooms. Then he could use nerve gas on the Kurds again, because nothing keeps order like biological weapons. In fact, we should probably give him a metal for his great management techniques, I mean who else could come up with the motivational idea of torturing Olympic athletes if they lose. A few death squads, some public executions, That is what is needed to restore order in Iraq. Maybe if a few more people disappear in the middle of the night, just to show up on top of a building waiting to be fed to a wood chipper. That should inspire peace. Much better than a self elected constitutional government.
2006-12-06 23:37:57 · answer #2 · answered by jdm6235 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No and he kept peace by genocide!!!!
2006-12-06 23:33:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
are you offering to be his first rape room captive?
2006-12-06 23:36:43 · answer #4 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
get real
2006-12-06 23:37:44 · answer #5 · answered by notyavgkat2002 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
WTF do you mean peaceful? Do you know anything about Saddam?
2006-12-06 23:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋