Which is better? Plays(stage productions) or Movies??

Question

I'm doing a general poll for an English course, to see what the public prefers better.

Answer 1

Plays, hands down.

What is more exhilarating that sitting in an audience an watching real actors put their heart and soul on the line? Will they mess up, will they flub a line? It take an incredible amount of talent to give night after night, performance after performance.

In the movies, they are pampered brats. Do a scene take a few hours break. Didn't like that take? Do another.

There are no "do-overs" in plays. It's sink or swim. Now, sometimes, depending on the play, they can be a little boring or the actors might be off. You don't have the luxury of the special effects or quick dialogue, but that's what makes stage productions so much fun. On any given night an actor might give the performance of his/her life. It might bring you to tears, have you rolling in the aisle, or squirming in your seat with boredom. But it's real, live entertainment. Gotta love it.

Answer 2

I love watching movies but in my own opinion, plays are better because it's live and no "camera tricks" are done. So, what you see is what you get. On the other hand the actors on a play should be given credits than on the movies because, in the movies, if an actor made a mistake, the director can always re-take it. However on a stage play, once an actor made a mistake he has to find a way to appear its part of the script, otherwise he will ruin the whole act.

Answer 3

Plays

Answer 4

It depends on the production. Chorus Line worked better as a stage play than a film

Answer 5

Please, be careful about the way you body this question. because i artwork in both degree productions and video clips, i am going to inform you that if it were not for the ideas of the degree, hollywood and picture ought to by no skill have existed. in the course of the excellent melancholy of u . s . a . of america interior the Nineteen Thirties, many Broadway actors, actresses, directors, and technical theatre technicians were out of work. So, with nowhere else to bypass, they ventured out west and placed artwork in Hollywoof. With them, they delivered their commerce: the forms of kit, the style of lingo like "action!", and the style of foundations that made Hollywood as effectual because it replaced into right now. So, to assert this is more advantageous suited is a real fallacy because affirming one is more advantageous suited than the different is truly affirming that hollywood's (and hence movie's) foundations are depending on the "weaker" (a lot less more advantageous suited) degree productions.

Answer 6

Movies are cheaper, less crowded, and you can pause them (If you're at home) I really do enjoy plays, but most of the time a movie is just more convenient and has better visual effects.

Answer 7

I prefer movies. More easily accessible and more variety.

Plays can be tricky. There must be a good cast. Less to choose from.

Answer 8

I look forward to plays more, but I can see more movies.

Plays are exciting and captivating! Movies are stuck inside a screen.

Answer 9

personally i think that plays are better. because you can better interact with the people on stage and the chance that something unexpected can happen. the play can be different on night to the next.

Movies are fun but they have that "polished" feel to them.

Answer 10

in my opinion, i would prefer movies. plays are great too but its not as interesting as the movies.