The question of whether or not any of the major European powers really wanted war in 1914 is a matter of opinion. Treaty of Versailles says that it was Germany who wanted war, and that the conflict was primarily their fault, but it was likely Austria, too had some motivations for starting such a conflict.
Regarding the assassination as a local dispute...On the surface it is such: the assassination of an Austrian noble by a Serbian terrorist. But...Austria had been having trouble with Serbia for years, and when Francis Ferdinand was assassinated they took the opportunity to punish the Serbs, being assured that they would be backed by Germany no matter what action they took or its consequences. Russia was historically the "guardian" of the Serbs, and had to embody that role in this instance, especially after having been embarassed in the Balkans only a few years prior. Even with the backing of Russia, Austria refused to cut Serbia any slack and figured that Germany would talk Russia out of committing. Unfortunately, Russian public opinion was such that the tsar had no choice but to step up, and that triggered Germany's involvement. Britain and France got involved only because they did not want to see Germany become any more powerful, because they were intimidated by their rapid growth in the past decade.
2006-12-06 14:59:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by just an inkling 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The assassination was not the root cause of the war, and it was not a mere ambassador who was killed. It was an Archduke.
There was a lot of tension in Europe at the time, stretching back through the colonial period. But there was also a balance of power, of sorts. Think of the assassination as a match thrown into a room full of fireworks. The explosion was just there waiting for someone to set it off.
As for the scale of the war, it was going to be huge simply because of all the alliances that had formed before the war. That balance of power ensured that lots of different nations would be very involved once fighting began. Weapon technology was a factor too. The machine gun made its debut in WWI, and chemical weapons (mustard gas) were used on a large scale, too.
2006-12-06 15:09:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Ry-Guy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's a reason the events leading up to WWI are often referred to as "the Balkan Powderkeg." The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian patriot in Sarajevo was the match that lit the fuse on the powderkeg created by the First and Second Balkan Wars. The local war ended up pulling in allies of both parties until the war spread across Europe, and eventually pulled the U.S. into the fight.
2006-12-06 15:01:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Melanie D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It wasnt an Austrian ambassador, it was the Austrian Archduke, heir to the Austrian throne, and your right it was just a regional dispute but it spiraled out of control, the reasons it spiraled out of control are very complicated, but the immeadiate reason was because of the allaince system, Serbia was protected by Russia, Russia was allied with France, Austria was allied to Germany, When Austria declared war on Serbia, Russia mobilized which caused France to mobilize, Germany ordered Russia and France to demobilize or it would declare war, they didnt and Germany attacked them both Germany attacked through, Belgium which was protected by Great Britain, and so it declared war. Very tragic events, but it was inevitable.
2006-12-06 15:07:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by asmith1022_2006 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off Franz Ferdinand was the Arch Duke of Austria-Hungary. He was next in line to the throne.
Secondly Austria-Hungary and Serbia had a love hate relationship going for years - mostly hate. A Terrorist organization called the Black Hand plotted and carried out the assassination as a means of hurting Austria for its treatment of Serbia.
After the assassination this event gave a legitimate means for Austria to punish Serbia and demanded the immediate arrest and turning over of all connected with the plot. Serbia naturally agreed (?) but failed to meet the time lines established by Austria. As a result Austria marched its armies into Serbia to force the country into submission.
Austria by treaty had the backing of Germany & Italy. Serbia close cousin to Russia was backed up by France and England.
Due to poor communications once the order was given to march Waorld War One was on.
I hope this answers your question.
K.Garlick - History Teacher
2006-12-06 15:04:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by kengarl 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
the respond is c besides the shown fact that, Austria did no longer declare war on Serbia in the present day away. First it asked Kaiser wilhelm of Germany whether he might help Austria, despite Austria desperate to do. He stated confident, so Austria issued a catalogue of unreasonable demands to Serbia which it predicted Serbia to reject. it would be this rejection that would supply Austria the excuse to declare war. besides the shown fact that, Serbia agreed to each and all the words of the ultimatum different than one. Britain then tried to call a convention to settle on the region peacefully and Wilhelm recommended Austria to settle for. besides the shown fact that, Austria went forward and delcared war on twenty 8th July - an entire month after the assassination. Russia had stated its purpose to assist Serbia and so all of it began to mobilise its military, yet in straightforward terms alongside its southern borders, no longer alongside its border with Germany. Germany demanded that Russia demobilise yet Russia refused, arguing it had no longer moblisled alongside its border with Germany. besides the shown fact that, Germany declared war on Russia on 1st August and activated the Schlieffen Plan to avert combating a war on 2 fronts (for sure no longer a physically powerful plan when you consider that that's what they ended up doing!). To invade France Germany went via Belgium which Britain had agreed to guard, therby bringing Britain into the conflict. so which you spot, it relatively is slightly simplistic to declare the assassination of FF brought about WW1. the certainly reasons bypass back a protracted time, or perhaps after the assassination a worldwide war replaced into no longer inevitable, it could have been limited to a miles extra constrained affair.
2016-10-14 04:35:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in addition to why russia wanted a war is that relations had not been good with austria for years. austria beat russia in a war a few years earlier so that is why they had negetive feelings for each other, russia wanted to improve its standing since they were beat in 1905 by the japanese. Germany could only align with austria and was challenging the set world order with its industrialization which bothered england and france was mad since they lost the alscae lorraine to germany in 1871, several intense times happened pio to that across europe the only problem was no one was really prepared and all thought it would be short and end in a few weeks
2006-12-06 14:55:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by gbulldogs88 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Archduke Franz Ferdinand, COUSIN to the German kaiser Wilhelm, in Sarajevo by a group calling themselves the young bosnians. The treaties and alliances that existed at the time dictated a war
2006-12-08 07:49:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by gbgnjhy 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
It was Austrian Royalty who was assassinated. It was not a local dispute, but an international incident. You need to do better research and you will find more in depth answers.
2006-12-06 15:07:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by mimi 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
they wanted war they just needed one more thing to tick the people off. the duke gets killed, Austria wants to invade and teach them a lesson. Russia says "hey we're allies if you fight we fight", Germany said they'll back up Austria and you know the rest.
2006-12-06 14:45:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by gets flamed 5
·
0⤊
1⤋