The under-reporting from the Pentagon of American deaths really get me. The report laid out consequences from bad to worse, including the threat of wider war in the Middle East and reduced oil production that would hurt the global economy.
In a slap at the Pentagon, the commission said there is significant underreporting of the actual level of violence in Iraq. It also faulted the U.S. intelligence effort, saying the government "still does not understand very well either the insurgency in Iraq or the role of the militias."
Bush seems to have the final word so... what will it be?
The Iraq Study Group report is available at:
http://wid.ap.org/documents/iraq/2006isg_report.pdf
2006-12-06 14:30:30 · 16 answers · asked by Rick 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No...if you knew how many study groups DC produced. You could probably find a study group that has come to the conclusion that day is night.
BTW..try this website www.theotheriraq.com and open your eyes to a non reported story.
2006-12-06 14:35:36 · answer #1 · answered by gbpipe 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No anger here, its about what everyone with a lick of sense who follows what's going on knew it would say. Notably, Bush and co. effed up in Iraq and it's time to remedy the situation. Thank God for a bi-partisan commission even though there are those who probably think its too political.
2006-12-06 22:39:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I didn't read it or listen to it cause you have to see it for what it is. It's an appeasment to the demo's like when you say to a child who doesn't stop nagging you yes, yes you're right to shut them up. They will chew on this for months now sidetracking them from what they should be doing and meanwhile Bush hopefully will continue on with what he's been doing best running the war without them. Unbiased??? ya right. We do have republicans who are more demo than republicans.
2006-12-06 22:38:37 · answer #3 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush administrations middle east policy has failed misrably.It looks Bush invaded Iraq to settle personal ego.It was not in national intreast.Can someone tell this asshole from Texas u r getting us fuc ked in Iraq.It is better to get Barbara Bush fuc ked by Iraqi insurgents rather than sacrificing our innocent solidiers.
2006-12-06 22:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by mike 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Angry does not describe it - I'm livid. All will come out now.
The media is in colusion with Bush - my friends and family never believe what they've been reporting for years. We read news from other countries instead.
Stupid repugs still support this murdering maniac.
2006-12-06 22:35:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We cannot win a war against psychos as long as the media and the democrats and atheists and pacifists are screaming for legal representation for the poor mistreated terrorists. We should have sent mercinaries in and wacked those suckers proper.
You gotta know how to play if you expect to win. If those soldiers had not died, the good ole American liberals would be accusing them of playing too rough. These are the criminals that keep our soldiers hands tied I tell you. Who is reporting that soldiers are evil and sending them to trial for doing their job????
2006-12-06 22:34:05 · answer #6 · answered by mspriveye 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
IN a slap at the neocons, Gates said he wasn't too thrilled with the Bush regime's creation of outside "intel" groups within the Pentagon to hurry us to war.
Good-bye Rummy, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Feith, Cheney, Bush, and all those other traitors who sold out the heart and soul of America.
May Almighty God judge you according to His Laws.
2006-12-06 22:35:45 · answer #7 · answered by teddi 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
They are talking about the government spending 400 BILLION DOLLARS and going towards a TRILLION, the deaths and injuries of our Valued Soldiers, and what you mentioned. Shouldn't this country want an impeachment trial for bush?
2006-12-06 22:35:17 · answer #8 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Since when has the Congress ever been the Commander in Chief? They have not the constitutional power to tell him how to run this war, and they need to quit breeching their powers...
2006-12-06 22:35:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Did you see who is on it?
1. Lawyers
2. Former Clinton cronies
3. Politicians
None of these people are military people. Their opinions are useless. We are at war and we need to act like it.
2006-12-06 22:49:53 · answer #10 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋