2006-12-06 14:18:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No. Killing the innocent people (Serbs were among them as well as Albanians and it is hypocritically called the collateral damage) is not a good excuse for stopping the genocide. On the other side, the stubborn politics of Serbia leaded right to the ultimatum (not for the first time in history) that could certainly be avoided with some better negotiation skills that almost all Serbian politicians are missing. And respecting the human rights too.
2006-12-08 02:44:05 · answer #1 · answered by Aurora 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was a war? I thought it was an international police action carried out by NATO and the United Nations Peace Keeping Force. I was in a class with a young man from Britain who spent 2 years in Serbia as part of that UNPKF and told some wild stories how they would sit in their armored car and listen to the bullets ping off of it because they were not allowed by the UN to fire back.
This was not the US invading a nation and was not a US led coalition it was an UN Action..as for the exaggeration of the genocide in Serbia and Bosnia...that post is from a total moron. Milosevic was eventually found guilty by the World Court in the Hague for his actions and the genocide he caused in Bosnia and Serbia.
2006-12-06 23:31:57 · answer #2 · answered by ThinkingMan2006 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I didn't. The claims of genocide turned out to be exaggerated, the miltiary action certainly didn't solve any problems over there, which are just waiting to reemerge once the NATO countries pull out and go home, and it simply got Americans stationed there killed and maimed--to protect a bunch of muslims, no less!!
The fact that Bush got our country's government in a more bitter and protracted war doesn't change the fact that there is really only one workable path for us. An America First foreign (and immigration) policy, where OUR needs, our security, and our well being are considered!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!
2006-12-06 22:29:45 · answer #3 · answered by dkmeller1953 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hmm, did I support the assistance of a people who were being murdered by a racially and religously segregated government? HELL YES!
2006-12-06 22:22:02 · answer #4 · answered by Chris S 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, but we are still there! Melosivic is dead! All to save some muslims that we supposedly hate! It is not muslims we hate it is extremist muslims and terrorists we hate!
2006-12-06 22:45:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We got in, we did our job, we got the UN to do its job, we got out. The genocidal maniac is in jail, others too, and things are sorted.
Unlike the current situation.
2006-12-06 22:27:10 · answer #6 · answered by sonyack 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i was indifferent to it since it was basically an impact range to do next gen weapons testing like the f-117 and the tomahak
2006-12-06 22:28:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Did you support Truman's war on Korea?
2006-12-06 22:25:47 · answer #8 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes he helped those folk a good bit.something needed to be done.and he did it.we should help people against others who would murder them
2006-12-06 22:23:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why. Does it prove a point or does it point to an individual person who is apart of a political party and fingers are pointed again, and progress is halted.
2006-12-06 22:22:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋