I was having this discussion with one of my friends the other day and would like to get some input from the women readers?
Sexually speaking, which type of guy would you rather have in the sack?
a.) a man who has good sexual control and can last 30 minutes easily, but once he has come he loses his erection. In other words, he has a long refractory period and cannot get another erection for at least an hour.
b.) a man who does not have as good sexual control and lasts for for about 10 minutes, but has little to no refractory period. He will come but he either does not lose his erection or can get one in a couple minutes and is ready to go again. He is capable of this at about 3 times.
2006-12-06 14:10:45 · 11 answers · asked by Achaholic 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
in the end, it seems like you will have the same result, sex for awhile (30 min or so assuming x3 in situation b), so I don't think I would have a preference.
2006-12-06 14:15:25 · answer #1 · answered by tendrel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
basically in both cases the man is lasting theres really no difference some woman like them to last i'd say most or atleast older women and younger women or inexperienced ones probly like it to be over with theres a lot of guys who have no control and also can not get another erection a lot of times women w/few partners dont even know other kinds of guys exist until they move on, I think most girls prefer to be in love as well makes it much better, good Luck KIMBUR
2006-12-06 14:22:38 · answer #2 · answered by KIMBUR 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Either one will do. You can get a good 30 minutes or have it split up and still have a good time.
Try this one not only do you get a minute man. He finishes in a minute or two roll over and go to sleep!!! Happened to me
2006-12-06 14:14:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is a really hard ? thank god i have never had any of those two but i would say that is would have to be A because as long i as i get off then we are okay and good sexual control is a plus. and i can't wait an no problem.>>>
2006-12-06 14:16:03 · answer #4 · answered by bjames_0050 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) defines premature ejaculation as a persistent or recurrent ejaculation with minimal sexual stimulation before, on or shortly after penetration and before a person wishes. Wow, that’s not a sexy definition. Personally, I define it as you come quicker than you or your partner wants. Luckly this is a great solution for premature ejaculation https://tr.im/770b8
2015-01-25 00:30:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the girls those who're troublesome to face up to: The Seductress kinds human being who makes use of body language and words and then toys including your ideas. the girls those who're complicated to ignore: the middle Breaker kinds even as she breaks your heart, then she leaves a crack in it. Who can ignore that?
2016-11-30 05:58:56 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely A. I like to have a little rest afterwards anyway.
2006-12-06 17:09:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow tough one.... probably A so then during that hour we are waiting for his soldier to stand to attention again he can focus on my needs alone.
2006-12-06 14:19:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say A. 30min. of good lovin is good for me...10min and then again, is hard for me to get satisfied since I cannot "get mine" without assistance, 10min is not enough.
2006-12-06 14:13:59 · answer #9 · answered by jessdjnick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a
2006-12-06 14:13:21 · answer #10 · answered by picture 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋