Running and screaming with their tail between their legs.
If it weren't for Iraq, what would they have to b*i*t*c*h and moan about?
I guess they could always go back to the old standby that Bush was responsible for 9/11.
2006-12-06 13:55:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Put on your boxing gloves boys! 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
They would rather pull out because they are misinformed as to what is actually going on, and they lack determination and overall heart. It disgusts me how people are so willing to put their tail between their legs and run away. Iraq is not as bad as the media portrays it.
The media is painting a scene, a warped scene that is not entirely accurate.I have served two tours in Iraq, Every Iraqi that I came in contact with was more than glad that we were there, I was a translator, and dealt with these people daily.
I knew from the beginning that this was not going to be easy, and I am willing to stick it out, if these armchair liberals had some heart, and would stop whining then maybe they could contribute some positive morale to the situation.
We re making more progress then it seems, terrorists are being thrown out of towns, the infrastructure is being built up, bridges and schools are constructed. It will take some time, but everything that means something takes time and hard work t accomplish.
2006-12-06 13:58:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by macrigger20 1
·
2⤊
3⤋
How can you win Iraq? We can't seem to find the answer to that question which is why we're still there. President Bush just said "We'll leave Iraq when the Iraqis want us too." WHAT THE HELL! Is the strongest army and nation in the world taking orders from Iraq who hasn't accomplished squat since the Mongols sacked Baghdad? Please, tell me a way to win the war (humanitarian movement) and then I'll accept that libs would rather chicken out.
2006-12-06 13:55:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zack 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Winning was never a possibility. Bush’s own father explained why in his book ‘A World Transformed’. Colin Powell knew it and that is why he told the President, “if you break it, you own it”. Every Middle East expert in the world (and all of Iraq’s neighbors) knew that removing Saddam likely would result in a civil war that would only further destabilize the already politically volatile region.
The question you should be asking is, why are conservatives so determined to lose in Afghanistan and Iraq, destroy America’s reputation, weaken its military and economy, and put the lives of current and future Americans at greater risk?
Invading Iraq was a stupid idea doomed to failure (in addition to being illegal and immoral). It is a loss and a failure, get used to it.
2006-12-06 13:57:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
it is that sort of thinking that has led to the mess we have made of Iraq and it is not just liberals but also republican conservatives that have finally saw the light and said it is a civil war more or less and we are losing it is now their plan to cut and run only it is called a re-deployment of troops they understand 6 years to late it was a war fought for the wrong reasons we should have gone to Afghanistan
2006-12-06 13:53:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Chicken out? If you ask me going after Iraq in the fist place was chickening out on Bin Laden.
2006-12-06 13:50:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
First you woud have to define the term "win." Because I can argue that we have already won in Iraq. The President got the public to believe his lies. He got the Congress to believe them too. They killed Saddams sons, probably. They even had a show trial and convicted Saddam Huician. Now, if you read between the lines, we have already won. bush already made a speech on a big aircraft carreir declaring victory, don't you remember!? Now, it is time to bring the troops home so we can celebrate thier victory!
2006-12-06 13:49:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by drecarter04 2
·
3⤊
5⤋
Because if we win, Bush succeeds. They don't want that. They hate Bush more than they love America.
2006-12-06 14:10:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why would conservatives rather kill thousands of innocent people and spend billions of dollars on a war that we dont really have any buisness fighting in instead of bringing our troops home and saving thousands of lives and focusing our attention on other more pressing issues and admitting they were wrong?
"fighting for peace is like *ucking for virginity"
2006-12-06 13:49:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
I'll bet a few days on the front line would change your mind. Or maybe if you lost a family member to it.
2006-12-06 13:50:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋