alaska, canada, texas, ohio, indiana, england, germany , russia, poland, france , or anywhere else on this cosmic spec of dust, it just doesn't matter, as long as she's cute and say's yes i'll drill for oil all day and all night untill the well goe's dry and still go untill i see smoke !, lol
2006-12-06 12:21:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean in the Alaska National Wildlife Reserve.
The standard reasons are that we need the oil to keep prices down, and to lessen our dependence on foreign oil. Further, you can show pictures of the current pipeline and try to demonstrate that this has not had an adverse effect on wildlife in general.
Also, you can visit sites on the net that are for doing this, like the oil companies sites and there doubtless will be "independent" and "grass roots" organizations, funded by oil, that will state the arguments for it.
2006-12-06 12:24:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by sonyack 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can show pictures of the artificial reefs that the oil platforms create. The sea life gathers around the off score oil platforms like they were a reef. There are some very cool pics that show seals and coral and all kinds of life living on the oil platform.
2006-12-06 12:16:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by scubamasterme 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know. I don't like when they start showing pictures like that. It's not fair when the debate is based on facts, and people start playing with others emotions.
Stress that it would pick up Alaska's economy, create more jobs, blah blah blah.
Im sorry I don't have more to add. Im not an expert in that field.
2006-12-06 12:21:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reduce dependence on foreign oil
Additional oil for exporting
Increase reserves in case gasoline rises above $3.00 again.
Jobs, jobs, and more jobs
If we limit the drilling area within ANWR to a few hundred square miles, we will minimize damage to the ecosystem
2006-12-06 12:19:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
we opt to locate all thoughts as we hit the end of inexpensive oil (brought about by top oil). also, we are going to drill there finally besides, as expenditures proceed to bypass up, so we may as well set up the guidelines now particularly than wait till we get so determined that we evade environmental regulations in our rush. even with the undeniable fact that it really is in common words a small area of the completed answer. actual oil production received't ensue for 10 years, and if all is going nicely for the oil agencies ANWR ought to produce as a lot as 6% of U.S. oil call for at its top (perfect estimate, no one's quite confident). yet a minimum of it really is going to tutor we are severe about reducing overseas oil dependency, which sends a message to the market. (oftentimes it sends a political message now, this isn't a significant replace like conservation and gas performance or electric powered automobiles may be - person-friendly to diminish our utilization 20%, my new vehicle receives 2x the mileage of my previous vehicle case in point). A Republican/Libertarian view of that's that market forces will encourage conservation and electric powered automobiles, and so on on their lonesome earnings and by no skill authorities intervention, yet facilitates for drilling in Alaska or the OCS is authorities managed, so we ought to continually get rid of authorities from the equation and enable the market administration how a lot drilling is going on.
2016-11-24 19:55:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
how about the fact that Caribou in Prudhoe Bay (another oil feild in Alaska) have grown in population AFTER the oil started to be pumped.
2006-12-06 12:22:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
for cheaper gas is why we need to drill for oil.
2006-12-06 20:26:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by scooprandell 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because its there...
2006-12-06 13:17:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by xyz 6
·
0⤊
0⤋