English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
8

which in your opinion is better to watch

2006-12-06 12:06:45 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

24 answers

TNA has more talent, is more about wrestling and not gimmicks and has 10X better action. WWE has the names, is at times funny and I still like a lot of WWE wrestlers but give me TNA.

2006-12-06 12:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by fistoflegend22 2 · 1 3

I'm a fan of both WWE and TNA but WWE rules!!! I prefer WWE cos its wrestling, comedy and drama all rolled into one. It is also entertaining whereas in TNA they only concentrate on the actual wrestling which means everything outside it is boring.e.g promos, storylines
I also think that WWE have better commentators and better wrestlers.

2006-12-07 01:24:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your a TNA geek. Let me tell you all the truth. TNA has better athelets. They are lacking in the storylines. WWE has better story lines, and a few wrestlers with good talent. TNA is the future of wrestling. WWE and TNA will probably go to war. They are both great wrestling federations.

2006-12-06 21:41:07 · answer #3 · answered by wolvejl 2 · 0 1

WWE. Let's face it. You could put anyone in a Hell in a Cell match. But what really makes the match special is the characters that develop over that span of time. It gives WWE the advantage of charisma, which is needed to win this.

Oh yea, they're wrestling is better because they have "real wrestlers" like Chris Benoit, Undertaker, Triple H, etc.

2006-12-06 20:28:02 · answer #4 · answered by DKAJC 2 · 1 0

WWE TNA has some good people like Sting and Kevin Nash but WWE just Dominates

2006-12-06 20:42:16 · answer #5 · answered by Malik 4 · 0 2

smackdown is the only reason why i watch wwe and impact i watch every week unless i dont fall asleep early or im not home but i watch both alot. they both are good just not raw because they got alot of losers on raw and raw is just no good anymore. neither is wwe but smackdown is. and tna is even better.

2006-12-06 21:46:09 · answer #6 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0 0

TNA. The WWE is getting way to predictable and boring. plus it's fun to root for the underdog. TNA focuses on actual wrestling, and showcases wrestlers with ability. plus they are actually getting better and better storylines as they progress. The WWE has moved completely out of the Attitude are and into the Cooperate era, where they target teens, and marketing, and move away from putting on good matches. They don't think outside the box, and TNA does.

2006-12-06 20:13:31 · answer #7 · answered by motleycrue0880 3 · 3 3

wwe and ecw rule because they have the best tna was the rejecits and tna sucks and so dose kurt angle and he wrestle like a girl and he cry like a girl.

2006-12-06 20:44:52 · answer #8 · answered by jacquierose1125 2 · 0 0

Neither.

Ring Of Honor, Dragons Gate and Pro Wrestling Noah beat them both out by a mile.

2006-12-07 09:55:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

wwe

2006-12-06 20:17:11 · answer #10 · answered by anthony k 1 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers