it must be understood that in any historical text there is extensive bias that portrays one group, country or event in a more positive light
some texts for example would ramble on about how Ferdinand financed the voyage to America for pages and have a brief synopsis on the genocide of the Arawaks and Tainos...is that not a little disturbing and the War of 1812, how many books are neutral bout whether the US lost or won?
please incorporate examples such as these into your response.
2006-12-06
11:54:36
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History
*FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE MY VALUES ARE DISPLACED YOU MAY BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE PRESENT BUT WHAT EVENTS LED UP TO THE PRESENT IF NOT THE EVENTS HUNDREDS OF YRS AGO. DO U UNDERSTAND THE PRESENT W/O KNOWING THE PAST? aND THINK OF IT THIS WAY-THIS INFO IS WHAT THEY ARE FEEDING INTO U AND U ARE BLINDLY BELIEVING IF IT DOESNT CONCERN U...TOMMORROW TODAYS SITUATION WILL BE THE PAST AND WHAT IF THEY TRY TO TELL YOU OTHERWISE ON IRAQ OR POVERTY IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES..SHOULD THE FUTURE GENERATIONS THAT DIDNT LIVE IN THIS TIME NOT CARE???
2006-12-06
12:23:30 ·
update #1