How are roving wire taps unconstitutional?

Question

PLease give evidence to support you're answer( you can say that they don't.)

Answer 1

As a general rule, they Aren't. However, under the 4th amendment to the US constitution, you have to have a warrant. And a warrant requires "probable cause". If you're wondering about Bush's Program, it's actually very simple. They never obtained a single warrant. Violating somebody's privacy without a warrant is unconstitutional.

And a warrant isn't that hard to get....

Answer 2

Roving wire taps are unconstitutional, because being apart of the government it is illegal to conduct surveillance over US territory without a search warrant, which entails probable cause. It used to be referred to as USSID 18, however now I'm not sure what is the new name given.

Plus, it is just plain wrong as a free society we have a right to privacy that shouldn't be denied, without probable cause.

Answer 3

I agree that to faucet an American's telephone without warrant is unconstitutional and should not be achieved. I have not have been given any subject by any skill besides the shown fact that for the duration of tapping the telephones of non-electorate. i'm no fan of Bush, besides the shown fact that i'm a Republican could be what maximum might evaluate "the far precise". Bush isn't on the "far precise". he's a lot closer to Hillary Clinton than to me.

Answer 4

I LOOKED AT THE US CONSTITUTION AND NO WERE DOSE IT SAY THAT WIRE TAPPING IS WRONG SO THEREFOR IT MUST BE OK.