As in techniques to ward off female attackers in much the same way as we currently have specific techniques that only work on males.
Say in about 50-100 years. Also, what would that class consist of?
2006-12-06 11:02:56 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
It isn't that females are necessarily less likely to attack at present - such a claim is insupportable - but the reason it is not seen as an issue or recognized outright is due to a lack of capability.
Lets face it, currently a woman physically attacking someone poses little more harm than a random child-quite often less actually. But this has the potention to change in the next 50 years, ergo the question.
2006-12-06 11:17:07 · update #1
honey you guys better get to work if there are none now because we are on the move
2006-12-06 11:06:56 · answer #1 · answered by jusme 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
God forbid!
These security cordons have become a status symbol now-a-days, If the same are extended to women, irrespective of status, these will give the much-needed status to them with security guards fore and aft.I shudder to think of the scenario after 50--100 years.The security guards would have a say in the bedrooms and the degree of nearness that can be permitted in keeping with the mandatoy security restrictions.
Theh hollowness of all this security scenario was revealed when I worked as a Priate Secretary to the late MP Madhu Dandavate. The day he became the Minister of Finance and security was posted at his residence he threw them out and informing the Home Minister he did not need any.Consequently visitors mistakenly went to the quarter in front of the Minister's residence where an ex-Congress MP lived and was entitled to security. The security guided them to the opposite bungalow.Anybody could walk in unhindered.The best security for anybody is he or she himself/herself.and you standing in the society. Even fifty years of his death people did not tolerate the beheading even a statue of Dr.Ambedkar.
2006-12-06 19:27:39 · answer #2 · answered by Prabhakar G 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Snapping there neck backward at a 90 degree angle. Always works.
2006-12-06 19:06:29 · answer #3 · answered by Elerth Morrow ™ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I always follow the "love em and leave em" approach. Heh heh.
2006-12-06 19:11:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋