Should there be just one baseball team for every state?

Question

I don't understand why not all 50 states have a team, other than a few states having more than 2 baseball teams while some states have none at all.

I know baseball can't be changed now a days but i think it would be more fair and better if every state just had one team.

Opinions?

People with no teams that pla for there state/city, who do you route for during baseball?

Answer 1

No offense, but that is one of the silliest ideas I have ever heard.

Can you imagine a team in Alaska? Or Haiiawi?
The travel back and forth to those 2 places alone would be unrealistic.

Answer 2

I think thats stupid. Im from chicago, home of the north side cubs and the south side white sox. Just because some states dont have a baseball team doesnt mean thats because another state has more than one. its not as if some states are hogging teams. some states have more than 2 teams. Youre a yankee fan? You should know that a good city rival is one of the best things in sports.

Answer 3

Alright well have you been up to alaska lately? Sorry but there is more fan base in certain cities/states than others. And if you dont have a team in your state you just root for a team that grabs your interest or that you respect as an organization.

Answer 4

ECONOMICS

plain and simple

professional teams are expensive, and some places just wouldn't be able to support the cost. If you had 500 million dollars to invest in a baseball expansion team, would you realistically pick a state with little to no economic growth potential? You'd learn in no time at all that you made a bad investment

Answer 5

A possibility, but Hawaii and Alaska would be quite... un imaginable. Now im trying to be nice here but this is a wacko question,

:)

The fact that i do agree that there should be only one team per state doesn't change the fact on how great baseball is now.

Answer 6

The teams are there to make a profit and there is no way a team could make money in, say, North Dakota. They play where the money is. If New York, California, Texas, etc. can support two or more teams, then they can have them.

Answer 7

That would only make sense if all states had the same populations. California, with 34 million people, can obviously support more teams than, say, Colorado can with 4 million.

Answer 8

You wouldn't be able to have teams raised in states like North and South Dakota. On the other hand, what should be done is to give any one of the teams from "New York" and let them be in New Jersey. If your stadium is in New Jersey, you should be called New Jersey. (Although, these are football teams like the Giants and Jets.)

Answer 9

communities with each and all the sunlight. in case you need to in straightforward terms draft with on your state california,florida,texas and georgia might have the terrific communities. The yankess and crimson sox might suck. I coach little league and AAU commute basebAll a protracted time 13-sixteen right here in tampa florida and the group that wins all of it in line with annum is usually a set the two from florida, texas, california, arizona or georgia. A group from anyother state in no way gets close. so as that tells you the place loads of the expertise is in this united states and whilst those childrens become older it tells you which of them states could be interior the playoffs in line with annum. in basic terms an occasion google who won the junior little league worldwide series it replaced into tampa florida a set interior the city the place I coach and in case you suspect Abc at present you observed a set from california win it

Answer 10

There aren't enough people in South Dakota to fill a stadium and make money for the owners