They're fine in the closet as long as they don't try to be hypocrticial and fight against gay rights but as soon as they try to be anti-gay, like a lot of homophobic homosexuals tend to do, you better believe they deserve being 'outed.'
I have no intention of forcing people out of the closet that are innocent and respect others. But that goes all out the window once ur mean and nasty (aka usually Republican).
2006-12-06 13:46:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
America would be a better place if politicians had a sense of shame and honor as well as some respect for human rights and dignity.
2006-12-06 09:41:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Liberal Blue here!
No. It shouldnt be in the closet or something to be ashamed of.
I want 'em out out OUT of the closet.
Not trying to hurt them though!
When they're IN all the do is make trouble for the rest of us.
Ted Haggard but one example.
"contempt for sexulaity is a crime agianst life"--Neitzche
2006-12-06 09:40:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by cannon Ball! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not sexuality that's being exposed, it's hypocrisy.
Most people are content to allow people's private affairs to be private, but when you make a career out of demonizing and stereotyping a "lifestyle" while secretly practicing it, the public has a right to know about the fakery and manipulation.
2006-12-06 10:00:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
you're saying which you have consistently striven to instill your son with healthy ethical values and carry him to be a competent guy who can tell ideal and incorrect aside. looks such as you have performed a competent activity. as a replace of residing a lie and marrying and having teenagers with a girl that your son does no longer love, he has chosen to come again out with the fact and do what's perfect... locate somebody who he relatively loves and nevertheless attempt to maintain in touch together with his family. And by your son and daughter contacting your gay son even however you do no longer approve of it basically shows that your infants are sturdy people who're ethical sufficient to choose family over their mom's homophobia. Now it quite is time so you might initiate being the ethical lady which you declare to be and initiate telling the real distinction between and incorrect. i understand that it's not ordinary as a Christian lady to settle for homosexuality, particularly if it quite is from somebody of your very own flesh and blood who you have raised to be a competent Christian and as we communicate. yet your son can't help his homosexuality. It replaced into no longer his decision, he replaced into born with it. i'm useful your son does no longer "choose" to be gay as a results of fact he's familiar with you're a homophobe and can disown him, particularly if he nevertheless tries to touch you. yet he's your SON... in case you have consistently enjoyed him and dealt with him with kindness once you concept he replaced into as we communicate, then why does no longer you if he's gay? he continues to be your son and he in no way replaced as someone. yet once you relatively refuse to be the sturdy mom which you think of you're and settle to your son for who he's, a minimum of do no longer disown your different infants and quite do no longer take criminal action. except your son is threatening you, you haven't any longer any criminal foundation for taking criminal action and you will basically look like a b*tch. basically enable your infants touch your son and be the selfish person who you're and pretend that your son does not exist. he's probable extra constructive off without you besides :)
2016-10-17 22:11:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by janovich 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, there will be a better America since there is a freedom of right which guarantee everyone to marry whom, he/she likes.as a matter of fact, freedom of sex,movement, and per suit of happiness
2006-12-06 09:41:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by richard4dealer 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Many Democrats are obsessed with gay sex.
It's on their minds all the time.
2006-12-06 09:45:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Can you supply an English translation?
2006-12-06 09:40:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
awah why take the fun away
2006-12-06 11:36:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Run that one by me again? I totally missed it.
2006-12-06 09:36:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by amosunknown 7
·
2⤊
1⤋