Don't get me wrong, I know Dwade has a ring and Kobe has 3, but look at the help they had: Shaquille O'Neal. LeBron meanwhile had absolutely NO help until Larry Hughes came around and then the whole team started to mesh, but come on Shaq is a franchis player, while Larry Hughes is often referred to as "LeBron's Scottie Pippen". I know Scottie and Hughes both have a lot of talent, but come on they aren't franchise players. Hughes is a 6'3" all-star guard, and Shaq is a 7'2" franchise center. If you took Hughes from LeBron and gave him a great big man like Duncan they would win 60+ games, almost every year. Let me hear your answers.
2006-12-06 09:13:15 · 5 answers · asked by tarheelsjordan 4 in Sports ➔ Basketball
I wouldn't say that who is better than who because it's really hard to tell. I think the reason why people win championships is because their team is good instead of 2 good players.
2006-12-06 11:26:25 · answer #1 · answered by Question 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is that LeBron, the best player in the league, plays in Cleveland (a small market team). With that he doesn't receive all the news / talk that LA or Miami player would.
2006-12-06 09:43:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LeBron, in my opinion, is definitely the 2nd greatest player in the game (behind kobe of course)
2006-12-06 10:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. BaSkEtBaLl 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I say put him with a 3ball threat and they would be great. He is best player in the league.
2006-12-06 10:47:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LE BRON GETS MORE THAN HIS SHARE OF PUBLICITY.
2006-12-06 11:38:04 · answer #5 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋