oj simpson is innocent. so why are white people still mad?

Question

is it because he's black. is it because a hes wife was white. or maybe its because they way us blacks reacted when he was found not guilty (which my family and neighbors threw a block party). i dont know if he did or didnt murder those people all i know is how good it felt as a black person and i know yall think its wrong but words can not explain. its how weve been feeling for years and to finally see you people feel unjustified like dave chappelle and master card said "PRICELESSS".

hung huh? and u call ur self black shiet so are you comparing all those blacks that have been hung by whites. u oughta be ahsame man im not saying he was innocent its what the jury said. yeah lookin at ur avatar looks like u was raised in the woods with ur cracka friendz. u and oj are alike both uncle tom azz mothafakaz.

then if u guys are so mad why dont u get mad at the jury. they are the ones who let him free. such hypocrites jus say it i can already feel it u wanna say "kill that n!gger" dats why i dont understand u get mad at the person but fail to realize how bogus the justice system is. i said oj is innocent because the jury he was.

ok im sorry let me rephrase my question. oj simpson is innocent says the jury why are you still mad at him shouldnt u be mad at the system. oj is a free man even though we think he is guilty we can not fault him for that.

whew i can feel the love! lmbao!

Answer 1

Remember: A Man is "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." If said man is not found "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" than simple logic 101 dictates that said man is innocent - not just "not guilty." Yes, The Juice was found to be innocent.

People are mad because the race card was played. White America has been playing the race card for over four hundred years in this country. And now they are upset. From day one, The "court of public opinion" convicted OJ long before the trail ever began... That is, the court of White public opinion. Black people just hoped that OJ would get a fair trail.

Marsha Clark and Chris Darden dealt the cards. The 'race card' was dealt to Brother Jonnie by the name of Mark "Mein Kampf" Fehrman. They (the defense and the prosecution) knew that evidence was planted. For the first time in LAPD history, blood was brought from the crime lab to the crime scene. the blood that OJ gave at the police station was brought to OJ's house and miraculously, some of the blood from the vile came up missing. Gee, I wonder what happened to the missing blood from the vile that was taken to the crime scene?? Gee, I wonder how the blood evidence found at OJ's house had EDTA in it??? We (in the black community) know that the police plant evidence. The rest of the world didn't find out until the "Rampart Scandal." Over 800 cases overturned due to police planting evidence and lying on reports; planting guns and drugs. We cannot deny this. Being a cop doesn't make you holy. Mark "Mein Kampf" Fehrman is a Racist and a lier and his testimony was discredited because he lied on the stand. The fact that Fehrman is a racist was used as a motive for his planting of the evidence. The defense had every right to play the "race card," in fact, they would have been irresponsible if they didn't. OJ was found innocent and You racists out there need to just get over it.

Answer 2

OJ has always maintained his innocence and this hypothetical book should be available and people have a CHOICE whether to read it or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
Read this:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
One of the World's top forensics scientists Dr. Henry Lee who worked on the case during the trial and saw the evidence, wrote a very good book "Cracking Cases" and makes some interesting points about OJ not being the one who committed this unfortunate crime.

Answer 3

You should go to crimelibrary.com and search O.J. Simpson. They have the case history and all of the evidence. I am white so I don't personally understand how you feel about black people always being blamed for crime and white people getting off for the same thing. I do understand where you are coming from. When O.J. was convicted, I was thirteen and and I knew nothing about the case. I just read about it when I heard he was coming out with that book. After reading about it, I have no doubt whatsoever that he is guilty. You really should read about it and then make up your mind. Would you feel different if Nicole and Ronald had been black? If O.J. had been white? If you answered yes to either of those questions, then you are racist as well. Would you want O.J. to go free? It is horrible that black people are discriminated against especially when it comes to the law. Do you know who Ruben Carter is? He is a black man, a former boxer, who was wrongfully convicted of murder and I believe it was because he was black. If you read about that case, you would probably agree. Like I said, I don't personally understand because I have never been discriminated against. But I really think you should read about the evidence and then make your decision. I just want you to know that not all white people are racist and some of us can make good decisions not based on someone's race.

Answer 4

If you don't know if he did or didn't murder his wife and Ron Goldman, why does your question begin with "O.J. Simpson is innocent"? I feel that it was an injustice that he was acquitted not because he is black, but because I think most of the evidence pointed to him. Why else would he write a book years later to open up those wounds again for the families? Even if he didn't do it, why hurt these people? I know it may seem like a "win" for blacks, and I can see where you're coming from, but he's not the kind of person who should be representing a victory in the black community, especially if no one knows whether or not he is actually guilty.

I am upset that the system didn't work (because I believe that he did do it), but I don't blame black people for his acquittal.

Answer 5

I'm a white person and I don't know why you think we are all mad...I'm not mad....I hadn't even thought about OJ Simpson in years until that latest nonsense about the book and tv show. Personally, I didn't want to think that OJ did it. I grew up watching him run through the airport on those commercials and didn't want him to be guilty....whether he was or not I don't know. But, that had nothing to do with his race or mine. Not everyone sees everything as a racial issue.

Answer 6

White People & conservative America need to just simply get over it. Lets think through history how many innocent people have been found guilty. This is just ridiculous. If white people wanted to make change they would be lobbying their congress people to make effective changes to the corrections system, but that not going to happen because this is how the underclass stays where they are. I'm outraged at this blatent censorship. I wanted this book, but I can’t have it because some individuals think that it’s wrong. This is bullshit; the outrage should be directed at the lack of upholding our right to the freedom of press. O' I must have forgot All of our rights have been diminishing since 9-11. Thanks conservative America you've just brought us one step closer fascism

Answer 7

I completely understand what you are saying.....except for the whole OJ being innocent thing. But you know he was guilty....everyone knows he was guilty...that's why you felt so good after the verdict...and it was very deserved.

Whites have been getting away with murder for years and especially been getting away with murdering blacks forever. So for the black community to finally see the shoe placed on the other foot (to see a black murder whites and get away with it) it must have been a HUGE joyous moment and much deserved.

So don't be ashamed to say you felt great after the verdict....you deserve it and i feel civil rights took a huge step forward with that verdict. However, please don't be ignorant and try to tell people you believe he was innocent, rather, take pride in the fact that he was guilty and got away with murdering whites because for every OJ simpson there are hundreds if not thousands of whites who have gotten away with murdering or abusing blacks with no justice.

Answer 8

So do you feel better now because you put down the white race? Guess what, I'm white and I can't stand white people because they think they are the sh@! Just remember, it's not the color of skin that makes a person wrong it's the persons heart that makes them wrong no matter black, white, brown or blue! By the way O. J. is a murderer. How would you feel if it was O.J. that was murdered by his whitewife? Execute the ***** huh? That's what I thought you'd say

Answer 9

OJ Simpson is not innocent he was an abusive spouse and proabably hired someone to kill Nicole Brown and her boyfriend. He didn't care about the Black community before the case, he was just using us as a public relations outlet so he could get us on his side. So far as I'm concerned he gets what he deserves.

Answer 10

The primary reason whites are angry about O.J. is how he seems to swim in a self congratulatory way with a knowing smirk and the twinkle in his eyes. Since he was found guilty in the civil case which had a more even jury, and because the criminal case was manned by inept city lawyers most people do not regard the criminal trial to have been fair, or even correct.
The anger comes from injustice and the pride in which he shows for getting away with it.
Your welcome