2006-12-06 08:05:17 · 7 answers · asked by bigbearbroc 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Michigan.
Their only loss was to the #1 team in the country...by 3 points...AT Ohio State. Vegas' oddmakers typically give the home team a 3pt advantage...so a meeting on a neutral field would go either way.
Florida hasn't looked dominant all season, except for beating Div. II Western Carolina.
2006-12-06 08:18:38 · answer #1 · answered by mesquitemachine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok......Florida to me is the number two team in the BCS.Michigan is a close second but when you dont win your conference and you think you should go to the championship game, come on now. That is like LSU saying that they should be in the BCS game. And why not they came in second just like Mich did. Or even Auburn who beat Florida who is considered by the BCS the #2. FLorida had a way tougher schedule and play harder compotetion. The Big 10 really hurt themselves by not having a championship game and by Iowa who in the presaeson was ranked in the top 5 and really blew it. Mich played a weaker schedule and thats mainly cause the Big 10 dropped. Florida deserves it. if mich had gone its like seeing a confernce championship game instead of the title game. a playoff would just be better, but the bcs has helped college ball become more popular than ever so they're gonna keep it
2006-12-06 08:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by buddy_z34 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like Fla. being the # 2 team for the simple reason if OSU and Mich had played in the final week instead of 2 weeks earlier, I believe that the BCS voters would have voted Mich. as being the # 2 team in the country. But i am glad that USC got beaten by UCLA
2006-12-06 08:27:24 · answer #3 · answered by luv2eatthebush 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Michigan is the better team, but they had their chance. Florida is champion of the best conference in the country and 12-1 is a better record than 11-1. Style points are bull. Anybody playing in the SEC is getting beat up all season like no other conference, so there's no real comparison.
2006-12-06 08:26:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Florida deserves to be above Michigan for the sole reason that they won their conference. It just doesn't make sense to have a team in the title game that hasn't won their respective conference. Especially when the team they lost their conference to is the team they would have to play in the championship. This hurts to say because I am a Seminole...but UF deserves a shot.
2006-12-06 08:12:08 · answer #5 · answered by stoneoasis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Florida is easily more deserving than Michigan.
A. They won their division
B. They played way more ranked teams
C. Michigan had a chance to play Ohio State and got whooped so having a rematch of that game would be stupid.
2006-12-06 08:15:20 · answer #6 · answered by ZEN MASTER 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michigan and Florida should play for the #2 spot and the winner gets OSU.
2006-12-06 11:35:24 · answer #7 · answered by ...mr2fister... 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋