English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-06 07:38:57 · 4 answers · asked by socomchik1234 2 in Arts & Humanities History

If it was a colony, who was its mother country?

2006-12-06 07:39:56 · update #1

4 answers

Korea,despite periodic invasions throughout its history from Japan and China, was autonomous for most of that time period, although it was influenced heavily by Japan for a bit and then Russia, and then Japan took them over in 1910.

2006-12-06 08:00:21 · answer #1 · answered by mr_ljdavid 4 · 0 0

If I understand your question properly, you are referring to whether Korea was under colonial domination or was an independent nation with perhaps colonies of its own. If this is correct the answer is not entirely clear cut. During this period of time in its history Korea bore witness to much turmoil. It was an independent nation in 1850 being controlled by the Choson dynasty which though independent had depended somewhat upon political ties with China. By 1914 Korea was pretty much a colony of Japan. Read this interesting website that has a synopsis of this interesting time in Asian history:

http://www.asianinfo.org/asianinfo/korea/history.htm

2006-12-06 08:01:46 · answer #2 · answered by mrleftyfrizzell 3 · 0 0

Short answer: three independent kingdoms until about 1873; under increasing Japanese and Chinese colonial control from 1873 to 1895; mainly under Japanese colonial control from 1895 to 1945.

Now for the longer answer:

Korea was a peninsula of three kingdoms until about the 20th century, and increasingly under Japanese colonial control during the Meiji Period (1868-1912).

Japanese kingdoms were at war in the late 16th century (1500s), and in the process of conquering the others, members of the Tokugawa family also led several invasions of Korea. None of these established a lasting colony.

The Tokugawa (Edo) regime fell apart before the arrival of American warships in 1853 (Commodore Perry's expedition - I may be off by one year). Perry's treaty demands overwhelmed the inept shogun (generalissimo, roughly), and nobles from the various domains conspired by 1868 to overthrow the shogun and "restore" the emperor. They, of course, would rule in the emperor's name. Thus always in imperial Japan.

All this is to say that, in the early 1870s, Japan captured and colonized a port (Pusan - check me) in Korea. Japan was wealthy and trying to develop some industrial capabilities, and needed extra resources.

China was pressing on Korean kingdoms from the other side, and in 1894-5, China and Japan clashed over their Korean territories. Japan won, and established colonial control - including resource extraction - over Korea. (Tong-hak Rebellion and Sino-Japanese War, culminating in Treaty of Shimonoseki.)

Japan was so jealous of potential competition from its colony that it enforced the spelling of Korea with a K in English, just so that its name would come after Japan's in a dictionary. (Older sources often refer to it as Corea, which is also its spelling in Spanish and other K-phobic languages.)

Japan did not relinquish its hold in Korea - unless I'm mistaken - until the end of World War II.

2006-12-06 08:41:52 · answer #3 · answered by umlando 4 · 0 0

it would not BE A WW3 till all the UN countries JOINS in the conflict! assume China to think of approximately their financial trades with th US and being a communist united states including their neighbor North Korea. If North Korea sends a missile in the direction of the U. S. it's going to be shot down. If it heads to Russia it may additionally be shot down. yet while it hits the two Hawaii or South Korea the U. S. could retaliate with protection stress attempt against. And we via a techniques has the 2nd best protection stress even nevertheless we've our troops scattered everywhere in the middle East. If we mandatory extra troops the UN could help us out. countries could contain the united kingdom, South Korea, and Japan(even nevertheless they technically have a protection stress). yet probable here countries might attempt to help Canada, France, and Russia. and needless to say China will attempt to barter and calm each thing down the suitable they might yet they gained't pass to conflict with the two counrties they are saving their troops in case of a protection stress protection. yet we don't choose help, yet while we combat this conflict by myself we can be spending the quantity of money into the 1000's of billions. All i choose is for the U. S. to deliver back "THE DRAFT" we would demolish North Korea. Plus even while Kim Jong Il dies his 26 365 days previous son Kim Jong Un "The Prince" will take over because of the fact the hot chief and that i heard this new child is as vicious as his dad and chilly hearted like him too.

2016-12-13 04:01:25 · answer #4 · answered by holtslander 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers