Sexism!
2006-12-06 07:30:12 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Drawing & Illustration
It's obviously male, I mean, look at the chin on that thing! I liked the smiley face better.
2006-12-06 07:38:24 · update #1
The profile is very male and so is the chin! Hmp!
2006-12-06 07:34:40 · answer #1 · answered by LittleThing 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seems somewhat ambiguous to me, a lot of ladies persons have hair that short... even though it probably is a male silhouette so that is slightly unfair. There are a techniques more advantageous major issues interior the international, although =)
2016-11-30 05:36:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, would you want the lazy group to have female avatars? Yahoo knows it is the under motivated males that won't figure out how to do the avatars therefore the default avatar is male.
2006-12-06 07:39:08 · answer #3 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree its disgraceful, they should give you the option to pick either a woman or mans silhouette depending on your sex, if it was the other way aroung, the fellas would be up in arms about it!
2006-12-08 00:32:43 · answer #4 · answered by Rainbowz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is just another example of cosmopolitan unisex.
They want everyone to look and be the same.
They have no imagination, no `savoir vivre` (good breeding)
2006-12-06 07:40:29 · answer #5 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The profile is of a male.
2006-12-06 07:38:50 · answer #6 · answered by CT 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whats wrong with it being a male are you trying to suggest that if it was obviously a woman it wouldn't be sexist. Thats so sexist!!!!
:-)
2006-12-06 10:48:11 · answer #7 · answered by mixturenumber1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those lazy wimmin should sort out avatars. You don't need a degree in computer science to do it.
2006-12-06 07:36:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not necessarily a male silhouette, it could a be butch lesbian
2006-12-06 07:39:46 · answer #9 · answered by d_jazzman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They could be female with short hair...
2006-12-06 07:33:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋