Do you think the ever-deepening crisis in Iraq is a consequence of this particular administration's incompetence, or do you think it is more the natural result of the conservative foreign-policy indeology?
2006-12-06 07:02:01 · 11 answers · asked by Steve 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"Ideology", I mean. I guess I should have proofread more carefully. How incompetent of me.
2006-12-06 07:12:18 · update #1
It's not conservatives, it's the neoconservatives. The Neocons created a think tank called the Project for a New American Century. Their goal is to "spread moral clarity" around the world. Members include...Bruce Jackson ex CEO of Lockheed-Martin, Donald Rumsfeld before and during his tenure as Secretary of Defense, and of course William Kristol. Their plan for this war was to simultaneously make Raytheon and Lockheed billions, while making Halliburton billions, or KBR more specifically. The problem with the Neocons is that they have no grasp on real foreign policy, or diplomacy. They are such a small group and I find it shocking that they are beginning turn all of the rational minded conservatives (yes I said it) into insane theocratic spartans with simple spin in the media. If anyone wether they be conservative or liberal, actually looked into the neocon think tanks, the ammount of our money they spent on their failed Rumsfeld doctrine, they'd be disgusted equally.
2006-12-06 09:08:38 · answer #1 · answered by hydroponix_nix_hex 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no its a fact that it always happens when a tyrannical dictator is taken out of power. or any new govt. there is a void and internal strife occurs. Look it up . not once in history has a new idea come about in politics and not had fighting. How long did it take the US to come to agreements after the secession from Britain? heres a hint... more than 3 years.
2006-12-06 15:09:01 · answer #2 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all started with conservative foreign-policy indeology and the crisis deepened beacuse of administration's incompetence.
2006-12-06 15:07:15 · answer #3 · answered by Jagan Mohan R 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It has to be the Bush's incompetence. I don't think attacking another country and going to war is a conservative policy, at all.
2006-12-06 15:07:16 · answer #4 · answered by jim 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think it has allot to do with the core of conservatism and this idea that the world is every man for himself and when you try to occupy someones land without the world as a whole together for the cause this is the outcome. Sorry Republicans but it is, we are all in this together not every man for himself.
2006-12-06 15:10:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
conservative foreign-policy ideology with a tiny sprinkle of incompetence because it not like that helps...lol..
2006-12-06 15:04:22 · answer #6 · answered by Lab Runner 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Both ,we should have never went in with a preemptive strike againsr Iraq , it was based on pure lies alone. Look what a mess one man has created.
2006-12-06 15:06:14 · answer #7 · answered by Nicki 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
And your constant undermining and complaining sure helps our troops and the Iraqi people a WHOLE lot doesn't it!
Get off your high horse, moron! It is YOU and every other brainless liberal zombie and your senseless words of hatred that embolden our enemies!
2006-12-06 15:07:41 · answer #8 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The results of democrats not supporting our president and our troops!!! The division caused by the left has fed the hate of the insurgents and given them ammo and hope!!!!
2006-12-06 15:05:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
One two you hit it the bulls eye both are correct.
2006-12-06 15:10:11 · answer #10 · answered by edubya 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋