The damage Bush has done in the middle east is, and I believe that history will support this, irreversable. But I would never suggest harm to a President, good or bad. While you may not support Bush, you must respect the office of the President. Otherwise you are not a patriot. But that's just my opinion.
2006-12-06 06:49:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
I don't think generals are advising retreat. All of the advice from the military has been ignored. Saddam secured Iraqi borders and kept law and order in Iraq with a 1/2 million-man army. We have been trying to do so in postwar Iraq with just over a hundred thousand men.
Years ago, the military stated it would take several hundred thousand troops to establish law and order in Iraq. That goal couldn't have been met without reinstating the draft, a route Bush wasn't willing to take.
Hi-tech weapons, tanks, and aircraft cannot establish law and order. That takes boots on the ground. A lot more boots than we were willing to commit.
2006-12-06 06:58:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
This is not a Neocon govt. There is not a single Neocon in the cabinet.
Generals are not advocating cut & run.
It was a terrorist state before.
Next time try using some facts. Facts are our friends.
You are advocating the assasination of the president of the United States.
2006-12-06 08:13:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blah... Blah... Blah. You liberals are a bunch of broken records that lack knowledge of the real world.
The generals ARE NOT advising retreat and defeat. And like most idiotic liberals, you use insults without actually knowing what they mean (Neocon). GET AN EDUCATION!
BTW, suggesting bodily harm to a public official or any other person is an abuse of freedom of speech, an abuse for which you could, and should (under the constitution) be arrested.
2006-12-06 07:03:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Firestorm 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yeah, you're right Genius. There was hardly any killing going on these before the war and Saddam wasn't supportiung any kind of terrorism. Do you believe in Santa and the tooth fairy also? The only general I've heard mention cut & run is that loopy democrat Wesley Clark. Probably one of the worst I've seen yet. You need to put the bong down and knock off the Kool Aid.
2006-12-06 07:02:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Killing fields?? Are you kidding me? My brother is in Iraq right now, he is in the U.S. Army. All you are hearing on the left wing nightly news is the bad stuff about Iraq and a bunch of lies.
I would really watch what I say on here. Big Brother is probably watching!
2006-12-06 09:07:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you do some research you'd see no world leader is w/o fault, some more than others. Right now the House is trying to become more non-partisan in this time of trouble. BTW do you know of a better present leader or country?
2006-12-06 06:52:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by spareo1 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Whose authorities replaced into it? George W. Bush by no skill had a authorities. the finished element replaced right into a mistake; with techniques from the persons, for the persons and larger.... do not imagine there ever replaced right into a authorities.
2016-11-30 05:35:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam was NO winner, but Dictator Dumbya has managed to do the impossible in making a high percentage of the Iraqi people NOSTALGIC for Saddam.
Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-12-06 10:29:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hmm. You cant beleive everything you see on the Liberal Media. Seeing that Congress (Republicans AND DEMOCRATS) supported the war in the first place, and could end the war if they would vote on it; I fail to see how it is Bushs fault. Especially when your Democratic brothers have tooken Congress, and not tryed to end the war, but tried to put in the draft.
2006-12-06 06:51:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by I Hate Liberals 4
·
6⤊
0⤋