Yes, by far Bush is the worst Presidant I have ever witnessed or any democracy in the history of the world has witnessed. At least with Clinton you had an Evil Genious. Here, you have a stupid Demonic puppet for the corporate dollar. At least his father knew how to handle diplomacy. Bush the younger ... diplomacy? Please don't make me laugh. Impeachment is too good for Bush, in my opinion he should burn on the stake for the mass slaughter and rape of thousands of innocents. He has stolen and then shat upon the American legacy. It will take 100 years of American Integrity to rid this stain of hell from our record. There, was that clear enough for you? If you want, just do the research but I would not listen to fox for unbiased new, that is the reason Republicans tend to be so stupid in the first place.
2006-12-06 06:17:25 · 22 answers · asked by NoFear OnlyUnderstanding 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
YES and history will prove it.
2006-12-06 06:20:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 10⤋
There you go again. That word, democracy. It means majority rule. We are not a democracy. We never were. This is a fiction created by the Wilson Administration when they were pushing us into World War One.
We are a republic. I know, in school they tell you that we are a democracy, but read it for yourself in the Constitution. The federal government guarantees each state a republican form of government. And then there is the pledge of allegiance. And of course the song: BATTLE HYMN OF THE REPUBLIC.
It's just one of the lies told to you in the public (government) schools. And of course, politicians lie every time they open their mouths.
A good example of a democracy is a lynch mob. Remember, majority rules. Now, in a republic, which means rule of law, every person is entltled to a public trial. And the jury must vote unanimously for conviction.
Remember, we are not a democracy, we are a republic.
But, back to your question. In my opinion, Bill Clinton was the worst president we ever had. He was a national embarassment. He should have been impeached for treason.
After Bill, it's kind of a toss up, there are so many bad ones. Jimmy Carter, who gave away our canal, FDR who got us into WW2 and saved Communism. There was Wilson, who got us into WW1.
Unquestionably, the best president we ever had, or probably ever will have was George Washington. Here was a man who could have been king. He wanted nothing to do with power, after all of his sacrifices. Can you imagine a politician doing that today?
2006-12-06 06:38:01 · answer #2 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you're fantastic , Jimmy Carter substitute into the worst President in our historic previous. And we are going lower back off that Liberal direction lower back, the forged element is that's going to in basic terms be 4 years like it substitute into then.
2016-12-18 08:41:25 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am no fan of bush. However looking at the whole picture, he has had to deal with more than most presidents. The problem is not him but us. We have gotten lazy, while watching our freedoms fly right out the window.
2006-12-06 06:41:09 · answer #4 · answered by Tyrone B 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NOT EVEN CLOSE, and I'm a Democrat!
Bush has increased entitlement spending more than any other President in history other than FDR. And he has increased them the most during his Presidency.
Thanks to Bush my neighborhood has Head Start, more cops, less drugs, better education, more WIC money and more lenient welfare qualifications.
We all hate the Iraq war, but must face the truth rather than spread lies!
Go Obama!!!
2006-12-06 06:23:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No.
If you study American History enough, you will find that Bush actually would rank about in the middle as far as Presidents achievements are concerned. He is certainly hated by liberals, terrorists, and other communists; but he is not the worst by a long shot.
Look up Millard Fillmore, James Buchanan, and Franklin Pierce.
2006-12-06 06:28:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Get real. You do know they were Presidents before your birth. Can you name some and what century they served?
I'm not even going to respond intelligently as all you are going to do is pick someone that agrees with you and give them best answer.
2006-12-06 06:28:20 · answer #7 · answered by Griff 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope I think Carter, Clinton, and Ford take that distinction.
2006-12-06 06:34:23 · answer #8 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd say it is a toss up between him, Hoover, or Nixon for the worst president of all time. Clinton was not perfect but at least he apologized for his affair, twice.
2006-12-06 06:26:25 · answer #9 · answered by rachee_gal 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Grant, as one other mentioned was goofy, About as corruptible as one could be. Jimmy Carter was at best ineffectual and at worst, clumsy and inept.
And...you're ranting and venting by the way.
2006-12-06 06:29:12 · answer #10 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You clearly have no grasp of history. Try studying other presidents and Bush won't look so bad.
2006-12-06 06:25:23 · answer #11 · answered by tabithap 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋