Ooopps...they already have.
2006-12-06 05:36:54 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They are not even listening to them they are drawing up plans for attacking Iran, the neocon dream of endless war and to hold and dominate the middle east's oil. Don't believe me it is part of their doctrine.
2006-12-06 05:55:42 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
LOL - I was going to say they haven't already? The two points that I thought were really useful were 1) All Mideastern countries, UN representatives, European representatives, and all other allies of the US in this war have to meet for diplomacy talks to put their collective heads together before the entire Mideast goes up in flames, 2) That we have to put real pressure on Iraq to stabilize their government, and if they do not, then we need to begin slowly withdrawing troops to show them they have no choice. No more of this "hey you all need to get your act together" and them saying "bite us we'll take our sweet time because you aren't going anywhere." I also thought their idea about having a permanent baseline of assisting troops to Iraqi's troops was a good point as well. I thought the group had some very good points, and they were honest about declaring there is no easy answer. But just because something isn't easy doesn't make it null and void. What's happening now is simply unacceptable, and whatever changes are made, they have to be put into motion soon.
2006-12-06 14:32:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh, I don't think we are going to hear much from the neocons for some time now.
Their policies were trounced at mid-term elections, and even a few of them have come out criticizing the administration's performance in Iraq.
It has become evident to nearly everyone now that the invasion of Iraq was as stupid a mistake as many of us said it would be before the war even started.
Bush will be regarded as possibly the most dangerous President this country ever "elected".
Dangerous not because he is inherently evil, but dangerous in that he is dealing with issues and making decisions that are way above his meager capabilities.
And by the way, has anyone else noticed a total lack of statements, speeches, or appearances by Cheney since the mid-term elections?
2006-12-06 13:45:33 · answer #3 · answered by halfshaft 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Immediately.
Believe it or not, they are all still in denial. Makes no sense. Now it's all just down to ego for them. Bush and the new S.o.D. Gates even concede lack of progress if not out right failure in Iraq.
But these losers still can't face reality.
2006-12-06 14:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
First off, you do not know the meaning of words that you are using.
Hopefully we will continue to bash the "STUDY GROUP'. Why can't all you libs go to france like one of your brethren promised to do? (and of course never did)
2006-12-06 14:08:56 · answer #5 · answered by muffin 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your use of the word neocon may be misrepresented in your question.
But, in the same vain that your question is asked: Neocon's were and are on the study group.
2006-12-06 13:42:52 · answer #6 · answered by ggraves1724 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
If disagreeing is what you consider bashing I'd guess that it has already started.
2006-12-06 13:50:51 · answer #7 · answered by Sean 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well judging by Alex B. Immediately.
And your right Andy G. This question is an obvious attempt of "liberals" to stifle free speech. Give me a break.
2006-12-06 13:40:33 · answer #8 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
In science the shortest possible quantity of time is called "Planck time".
2006-12-06 18:19:38 · answer #9 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have bashed it ever since I found out they want us to negotiate with Iran and Syria. Call me out for my beliefs, I don't care. I still stand by it, and these little insults aren't going to change my mind
2006-12-06 13:46:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋