Anything would be better than what we got.
2006-12-06 05:30:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
If McCain were elected we would still be in Afghanistan only, ensuring long term stability. There would be no Iraq situation.
If Gore were elected there would have been a few cruise missles fired at deserted Taliban camps, and we probably would have had another attack. He would have lost to McCain in 2004.
2006-12-06 05:43:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by hinduhammer8 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
this is a humorous yet logical factor. i don't know what they'll do. he's a splash older than maximum different presidents/presidential applicants have been. additionally all you people who think of that's making relaxing of his age are incorrect! This individual basically had a question and are questions so undesirable. this sight replaced into made to respond to questions.
2016-12-11 03:26:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry that he didn't win the nomination in 2000 and then the presidency. I think that things would be better than they are today.
I hope he wins in 2008.
2006-12-06 05:32:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sean 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
In both cases, I think it would be better. However, the question is pointless, a time machine does not exist, and it is unlikely one will be developed in the foreseeable future.
2006-12-06 05:30:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It might not be quite as bad in Iraq.I hate to admit it,but McCain wouldnt have Bush41's infinished business on his mind,so our attack plan post 9-11 could be very different with deifferent resuls
2006-12-06 05:28:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by cannon Ball! 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Its Wed maybe you should call in to Montel show and ask Sylvia Browne
2006-12-06 05:28:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
honestly, that is a scary thought!!!!!!!
2006-12-06 05:32:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by caroline k 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I miss your threats and hate mail, please write!
2006-12-06 05:36:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
3⤋