2006-12-06 05:17:10 · 17 answers · asked by will p 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No she is on the liberal wing on the Democrats, but is most definitely not a Socialist. If this is meant as some slur on Ms Clinton perhaps you should check out the meaning of Socialism. Ms Clinton is a social liberal, but does not believe in the state ownership of the market (which is the basic tenant of Socialism)
As a European I hope she wins the presidency, however, that is only where the choice is between two almost indistinguishable right wing parties one of whom doesn't interfere in Private family matters. America would benefit greatly for having a real socialist alternative but unfortunately you don't. Perhaps if you ever did have a Socialist government the standard of the American education system would greatly improve and you could start to fulfill the grand ideas which the founder father's had for the country.
2006-12-06 05:21:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yep. Some ill-informed person replied "No, she is a Democrat" and he's obviously too ignorant to realize that Democrat and Socialist are one and the same. Read up on the ideologies of Socialism and Communism -- you'll be frightened to see just how much of those schools of thought are being repeated by liberals. If the Democrats get their way, the U.S. will become the next Soviet Union. Sorry, Communism and Socialism didn't work in Russia, and they sure as hell won't work here.
2006-12-06 13:25:01 · answer #2 · answered by sarge927 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hard to say but I would definetly say she has socialist type ideas and a socialist type agenda. There are many college professors today that are socialists so this should not really be such a great surprise to many.
2006-12-06 13:47:11 · answer #3 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. And unfortunately, many people (liberals) have been brainwashed into thinking that there's nothing wrong with that.
God forbid, if she's elected, she'll instigate a Socialist regime and the Bill of Rights could be all but rendered null and void. Every sick liberal cause will be perpetrated upon us, and will be doing at least 4 more years in the hell of of San Clinton, after we've already served 8. This really violates "cruel and unusual punishment," as far as I'm concerned and anyone who votes for another Clinton is a betrayer, in my opinion.
Another sick liberal is that Osama Obama.
2006-12-06 13:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Who cares! She's hot! A B.W.A.! Smart and sexy. I would butter her muffin every time she asked!
I am the Fringe and after 8 years of 'The Brat', a firm motherly hand is just what the doctor ordered.
2006-12-06 13:45:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on who is watching her and who of those watching can further her political career. She panders....that girl...like a Chameleon!
She would admit to being a Martian if she thought it would help her career, but then most career politicians would do that so...what was the question again?
"standard of the american education system would greatly approve" ----Should that not read IMPROVE?
2006-12-06 13:25:33 · answer #6 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think she is, but she's presenting herself as centrist until she gets the nomination and runs for President. If she gets elected she'll feel free to let her true beliefs emerge.
2006-12-06 13:38:40 · answer #7 · answered by Sean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a rhetorical question...
2006-12-06 13:19:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
if being more conservative than most conservatives, makes you a socialist, than i guess she is!
2006-12-06 13:21:45 · answer #9 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She is scary! I really hope she does not run for office! No telling what she is up to!
2006-12-06 13:19:53 · answer #10 · answered by ~*Sweet Pea*~ 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋