i mean first of all the people involved in the iraq study group looked like they were from homer simpson's father's old peoples home. they all looked very retarded. the guy who was asking which reporter should ask a question made over a hundred facial expressions, he also looked as if was chewing tobbaco.anyway let me get to the point most of the things in there the world knew anyway, ok the one recommendation that they mentioned " that the u.s should not have any control of iraq's oil supply " what did they mean by that? so iraq's oil supply is still controlled by the u.s?
2006-12-06 05:06:57 · 6 answers · asked by w.m.d's_bro 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
basicaly it means what the world allready knows, the whole iraq war was about oil, nothing else, nothing to do with saddam hussian, just oil,,,, and people in the u.s were fooled into thinking iraqi's had total control of thier oil supply even after the election, well this report just proves the u.s are still controlling iraq's oil for thier own use, and not for the gains of the iraqi population. the new nazi's should never be trusted by any country again.
2006-12-06 05:25:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
That's a good point u brough up. What has made this study group findings interesting is that they didn't say we should pull out of Iraq nor stay. I believe that Iraq is more problomatic.
2006-12-06 15:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by chuck h 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
O yeah man are you kidding me Money makes the world go round.....the U.S. Gov. is planning to spend 800 billion dollar's by 2020 for a lunar space station on the two poles of the moon.....can i ask on question. why when there are some many people starving and with out work all over the world....because its only going to cost 700 billion for this ridiculous project and some one is getting a very nice pay raise
2006-12-06 13:12:32 · answer #3 · answered by Lab Runner 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Bush flew to Iraq in June for a rare visit (his second). He pressured the Oil Minister to sign long term contracts with US and multinational companies. The constitution literally called for approval by the entire parliament of these contracts, but Bush overstepped those laws too. In any case, the Iraqis need the assurance that the US is just not there for the oil; it's a logical conclusion on their part!
2006-12-06 13:11:32 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
THIS JUST PROVES THE U.S WANTS TOTAL CONTROL OVER GULF OIL.IRAN'S OIL WOULD HAVE BEEN NEXT IF OTHER WORLD POWERS WERN'T ON THIER SIDE, THE NEW NAZI'S HAVE ARISEN,
2006-12-06 13:44:18 · answer #5 · answered by mr.truth 2 · 6⤊ 1⤋
THE PROBLEM WE HAVE TODAY IS THAT WE HAVE A MODERN COUNTRY WITH LEADERS THAT HAVE ANTIQUATED THINKING. 2006 LOOK WITH A 1950'S MIND.
2006-12-06 13:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋