2006-12-06 04:31:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
She is OK in the House but knowing the estimation of our enemies toward women, I don't think they would evaluate her as a strong military force thus we would be in more probable danger. I heard some ME countries are awaiting the '08 election to see what gives.
2006-12-06 06:36:26 · answer #1 · answered by spareo1 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i could evaluate donating yet i could incredibly donate that money to Obama. Please keep in mind, Republicans choose her to be nominated because of the fact she's between the few Democratic contendenders they have a super gamble of thrashing. Bush Clinton Clinton Bush Bush Clinton 24years? Jeb next? usa needs replace. the international desires replace.
2016-12-13 03:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by boynton 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to see her run as a VP with General Clark. But thats problably not going to happen. The republicans do fear her, but she needs to stop being a fence rider on the war. The longer she keeps that up, the more votes she is going to lose.
2006-12-06 06:50:14 · answer #3 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with DJ and JR above about her and the package deal you get. The democrats do care for things I do, such as providing more benefits to the elderly, our children (schooling), as well as a plethora of other hot ticket platforms that actually matter to the democrats and not to the (ultra)conservatives who are mostly in control now--but only till January when the dems take full control of congress. i do disagree with a lot of her stances though, as she is indeed quite liberal/extreme about lots of issues, too much so for my liking. So, I don't know really. I would have to go only as far as to say I think she is an O.K. candidate. I'd more likely vote for Barack Obama from Ill (Illinois). Good question btw. Take care.
2006-12-06 04:53:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
A very poor choice for a party that desperately needs to win an election.
2006-12-06 05:40:52 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you are old enough and can remember how this country was when Mr. Clinton was in Office then you would know that it was alot better, I will surely vote for Mrs. Clinton. Its a package deal and we need more funds for our schools, our disabled, our elderly and we need our troops home.
Yes I served as has my entire family.
Yes I think she can do the job on her own. But with Mr. Clinton by her side, we get two for One.
2006-12-06 04:45:42 · answer #6 · answered by DJ 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I'm actually a bit against it. As unwarranted as their claims are, Republicans have somehow successfully characterized her as the devil incarnate. As a result, she seems like a divisive candidate (though she's not really).
2006-12-06 04:39:56 · answer #7 · answered by ralph w 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think she could do a great job, but she won't get the nomination because of the narrow minds that still exist in our society regarding women.
2006-12-06 06:53:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Although clinton was a good president, i do not think we should have a female for president... nore should you vote for her if she runs just beacuse you liked her husband...
2006-12-06 05:49:02 · answer #9 · answered by DRU 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She has the right to do it, but not even the Dems will vote for her. She's too extreme.
Everyone wants a moderate for president in 2008.
2006-12-06 04:41:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋