English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ps] as far i know its a person that gives a gift then takes it back.....but what does this have to do with Indians? And does it refer to Native American indians or those from india??

2006-12-06 04:25:29 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Trivia

5 answers

The term "Indian Giver" comes from North America, Canada and The U.S.
When the British came to North America and began to colonize it they traded with the Natives. And at times the Natives would give the British furs, tools and other items. After awhile the Natives retrieved these things. And giving the language barrier the British did not know that the things they were given were only on loan. This upset the British because they felt insulted and offended. It also confused the Natives. Only because they didn't understand each other. Hence the term "Indian giver".

2006-12-06 07:13:48 · answer #1 · answered by zzap2001 4 · 0 0

It is a derogatory time period for any person who offers anything away, alterations his brain and desires it again. For 3 hundred years, quite a lot of Indian companies made treaties with the British then US governments wherein they offered land for cash or items. Quite regularly, the Indians later desired the land again. The whites viewed this to be a horrible factor and accordingly the time period Indian Giver got here into being. But what used to be particularly going down used to be one of the crucial following: a million. The Indians regularly didn't appreciate what they had been signing and signed with an X as they didn't learn or write, two. The marketers for the US executive who instigated the treaties regularly attempted to trick the Indians into signing through plying them with liquor, three. The US executive marketers could have Indian Chiefs no longer related to the tribal land signal the treaty with out the talents of the tribe who honestly owned it. four. Treaties that WERE legally signed and understood through the Indians had been regularly damaged first through the white guys. Often there used to be a clause within the treaty which recounted that the Indians retained a part of the ancestral tribal land, which white settlers needed to keep off of. When the whites omitted this aspect of the treaty, the Indians assumed, rightly, that the complete treaty used to be now null and void, five. Indians didn't appreciate the proposal of land possession and didn't discover that in the event that they offered the land they would not hunt, acquire, or survive it.

2016-09-03 11:30:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Indian giver, n. Chiefly U.S. Informal.
One who gives something as a gift to another and then takes or demands it back.
It came about from the fact that North American Indians would ask for the return of their gifts if they received nothing in exchange.

2006-12-06 04:37:25 · answer #3 · answered by Julez81 2 · 1 0

Indian giver derives from the alleged practise of American Indians of taking back gifts from white settlers. It is more likely that the settlers wrongly interpreted the Indians' loans to them as gifts. This term, which is certainly American, may have been coined to denigrate of the native race. Historians would now agree that, where deceit was concerned, it was the settlers who were the front runners. It isn't uncommon, and it could be argued that it is customary, for the conquering race to attempt to justify their invasion by dismissing the conquered as dishonest and stupid.

2006-12-06 04:29:11 · answer #4 · answered by Melli 6 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers