Britney Spears makes so many stupid decisions all by herself but I would think she would be smart enough to hang with someone other than Paris.
And what is up with her showing her coochie? When I saw the picture she had her legs wide open and her dress was up around her stomach so it didn't look like an accident. It looked like a porno spread. Anyway, that girl needs to get her act together and be the mom she's supposed to be. She's not being that great of a role model for her little sister either.
2006-12-06 04:28:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tiacola Version 9.0 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's just a publicity stunt. They even threw Lindsay Lohan in the mix. You and everyone else knows the Britney and Paris and never been seen together, let alone their names being in the same sentence. Lindsay and Paris...........they've hated each other for years. Paris is THE person the seen with and that's why Britney publicist told her to do this for a better image. If she wants a better image then she should concentrate on her kids. She hasn't proven herself to be a decent mom yet, even when she was with that idiot. Even Paris sold more albums than him and she sucks too. Funny how there was convenient talk of Briteny's new album too when all this going on.
2006-12-06 04:38:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Italionaire 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
you're probable ideal approximately Britney, and it shows you have a coronary heart. i might quite be pals with Lindsay Lohan as a results of fact, of the three of them, Lindsay is the only one that relatively has expertise! i does no longer pass over the different 2 in the event that they disappeared from public existence and went and have been given a activity at McDonalds or some thing. yet Lindsay Lohan has an remarkable appearing profession basically before her if she will triumph over her very own demons.
2016-10-17 21:45:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think is one big publicity stunt by Paris to get more attention, she knows that if she's seen with Britney that she will get more spotlight. Paris isn't really a good influence being that she is young and single, while Britney is young with 2 children.
2006-12-06 04:29:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I can't say that I actually think or care about this. I couldn't care less what those two do. It doesn't affect me or my life in the least. If one or both died (and I absolutely do not wish this on either of them) my life would not be changed at all. They can go whoring around and running around without underwear all they want. I don't spend any money on the crap they push anyway.
2006-12-06 18:57:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by DawnDavenport 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really think you should stay home with youre baby for the first year.I think she is doing this to forget how sad her life really is.
She should be hanging with other mothers and her kids on mon or tues night.Not flashing the public.She has no class.And so of course shes gonna party with the only girl that goes and partys every night of the week.Pure trash no matter how much there clothes cost!
2006-12-06 04:30:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by miz 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Birds of a feather flock together. I think both are REALLY dumb! I agree with an earlier post - Dumb and Dumber
2006-12-07 01:14:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They both lack intelligence, grace, and common sense. Isn't if funny how often Paris has been photographed sans panty? Is Britney copying her or what?
2006-12-06 04:24:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Christabelle 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Publicity stunts!!!!! Britney is getting her name every where and her picture of the new skinner ME every where!! Plus no one is mentioning her marriage and divorce to that retard. Yes, we all new it would fail.
I think the whole thing is a giant scam. They probably aren't really friends.... their agents put this bullsh*t together... and you know what it's working!! We are all talking about it!!
2006-12-06 04:24:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
brit has taken a turn for th worse but paris has always been like that
2006-12-06 04:20:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by keogh 1
·
5⤊
0⤋