I doubt those in the region will become involved in any war other than the factional war in Iraq. Underneath it all, Middle Easterners now know what the U.S. has caused in Iraq and they do not want it to extend any further. My guess is that there any number of clandestine meetings going on between many Middle Eastern countries (to include Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Kuwait, United Arab Emerates, and yes even Jordan), and that something is brewing in the Middle East that we know nothing about. As far as a heavy troop presence, that is par for course. However, we're being watched closely now. Oil interest by the United States in Iraq is widely known. There are likely many plans by these Middle Eastern countries to keep their oil .... at any cost. And to get the U.S. OUT of Iraq...at any cost. and at this point, the US seems to be the predator
2006-12-06 03:45:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
regardless of ways we view our troops in Iraq, i ought to wager this is more advantageous major how the Iraqis viewing our troops in Iraq. And some thing of the Muslim international locations. actually there are some Iraqis and Muslims who see their women persons and toddlers being blown up, and characteristic the violence to our presence. and each and each and every son or daughter that receives blown up has a kinfolk. And one in each and every of those kinfolk individuals must be mad adequate to strive against decrease back. in the journey that they imagine the blood is on OUR fingers, we only made yet another terrorist. more suitable with techniques from style of civilian deaths divided with techniques from a real looking ensure who've a minimum of one relative loopy adequate responsible us and somewhat do some thing to retaliate...i ought to assert with techniques from the time this is throughout, there'll be so a lot more advantageous terrorists in Iraq than when we all started this mess. and that i gotta say, we are there back for what? I save in ideas the 9/11 hijackers being Saudis...yet i wager they get a bypass. not that i assumed retaliation replaced into the perfect theory. (yet mom!! He hit me first!!!) Like spoiled little toddlers, and an countless, senseless cycle.
2016-11-30 05:22:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will keep a presence there, no doubt. Given the predatory nature of Iran and Syria, to do otherwise would be foolish. Same as Korea, Germany and other locations worldwide, we will hang out and try to make sure things don't get too out of control while protecting American interests.
2006-12-06 03:50:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rich B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
With all my exxon stock and BP stock I am hoping for a total meltdown over there and I will be rich as midas. All the environmentalist that 5-6 years ago wanted 5 dollar gas will get their wish in spades.
2006-12-06 03:44:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
May be so to match the US hidden agenda - pre-emptive attacks on Iran and Syria and possibly Pakistan too!
2006-12-06 03:46:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sami V 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
We're still in Germany son. And Japan.
WWII has been over for awhile now and we're still there.
2006-12-06 03:44:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by John #3 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, you already see where that is heading.
2006-12-06 03:48:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by T S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋