How will you convert this fusion energy to substitute fossil fuels for vehicles?

Question

Piease explain me how the energy derived from fusion reactor can be used in place of fossil fuels. whether the energy derived from reactor is going to be converted into electrical energy for the use of vehicles.

Answer 1

A fusion reactor is much too big for a vehicle. You would have to store it in the vehicle in a battery or use the energy to produce something like hydrogen that the vehicle could use as fuel..

Answer 2

A fusion reactor (if it's even practically possible) would be used in the generation of electricity and theoretically would be safe and cheep. If so this could help make electric vehicals more practical, although I believe we will be using Hydrogen Fuel Cells long before a practical Fusion reactor will exist. I say that because if I'm not mistaken BMW is already making a hydrogen buring vehical.

Answer 3

this is the picture of a damaged authorities. edit: Wow, large answer from JS. DrM somewhat has it maximum excellent. the entire boom economic gadget of the international is in accordance to source extraction (be it mining or agriculture or fishing) and the fee extra to those factors. Or, you should assert, the fairness markets of the international are a large Ponzi scheme depending on the destiny fee of factors. What occurs even as the criteria run out? What occurs even as the source base is poisoned and could now not produce or maybe keep up? What cornucopian capitalism fails to understand is that factors are finite, both in what must be extracted and the volume of waste that must be assimilated. the answer is a sustainable economic gadget. i am going to't say what that could want to look like, yet making socialism the bogeyman doesn't remedy any situation, it in elementary words serves to perpetuate the present gadget of graft and inequity. If our social structures were clear and honest, capitol holders ought to artwork to guard the commons as a replace of exploiting them for each very last dollar. JS has observed what's happening now and why. Vote third social gathering, vote eco-friendly, vote some thing yet status quo. In a rational international there must be no favor for subsidies. human beings ought to opt for continually sparkling loose power from the solar (loose as in loose from undemanding fee) as a replace of finite and poisonous power from carbon, no matter if the up the front costs were more advantageous - because they could do not forget that the lengthy run costs were a techniques worse. yet we do not stay in a honest clear economic gadget and in lack of comprehend-how the we fall for the fake decision.