cause i really like roddick but he never seems to win against him,he always gets close but ends up losing.he eve \n calls him one of the best,which he is,but even hes real good.iam not a tennis fan but watch it frequently.
2006-12-06 02:05:50 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Tennis
Roddick is sick with it, but will get inconsistant when frustrated. He could beat Federer like next year, and hopfully does. I don't want Sampras's title to be broken by Federer, i just don't like him that much.
2006-12-06 09:40:10 · answer #1 · answered by lilstefon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can understand that you like Roddick, but it's a shame that you can't appreciate Federer more.
Roddick is a one-dimensional player. He's a server.
Fed is the most complete player currently, and he may be the most complete player ever. His shotmaking is brilliant, reminiscent of McEnroe.
If Mac says that Federer is the best player he's ever seen, that's good enough for me.
In 20 years, probably no one will remember Roddick, except he might have paved the way for newer players to serve 160-170 mph, making tennis EVEN MORE BORING.
If Fed gets to Pete's record, plus wins a French Open, he will be unquestionably the greatest ever.
Just something to think about the next time you watch Roddick play Federer.
2006-12-06 22:09:40 · answer #2 · answered by H_A_V_0_C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Roddick beat Federer in 2003(or 2001?), check the youtube.com video. Roddick even hits a shot between his legs and still won the point. But it was a very close match. I want to see Taylor Dent, ha ha ha! I crack me up!
2006-12-08 17:56:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am Federer's fan I enjoys when Federer beats Roddick
2006-12-06 16:19:34 · answer #4 · answered by DX 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I can't stand Roddick. He oozes arrogance, besides Roger is the greatest player ever Andy doesn't stand a chance
2006-12-06 08:05:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
federer is a lot more experienced and better than roddick.. but who WOULDN"T want to see federer lose to him? GO RODDICK!
2006-12-07 18:38:47 · answer #6 · answered by WsUpiTzM3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
roddick can but omly in his dream. have u not watched how federer win wimbeldon. north or south federer is the best.
2006-12-06 02:18:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would i have a signed andy roddick poster would love to see that go up in value.
2006-12-06 08:56:11 · answer #8 · answered by question man 911 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't...it's great the way it is now. Andy is a one trick pony,
while Roger is multi-dimensional. He doesn't have the class of
Roger, and is a lesser player. Roger can win claycourt titles,
while Andy struggles there. Roger is superior to Andy as a
tennis player on every surface.
2006-12-07 03:52:17 · answer #9 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I lyk Federer bt den again if he loses he gets quite angry so I agree wit u
2006-12-06 02:08:13 · answer #10 · answered by interested 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋