2006-12-06 01:58:08 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What history?
Or are you thinking of CATHOLICS?
I'm one of those too!
2006-12-06 01:59:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
A) Democrats have never supported adult/child sex. The NAMBLA/Democratic connection is a right wing talk radio fiction.
B) The real issue behind the Foley scandal wasn't Foley himself but rather the ineptitude the congressional leadership demonstrated in handling the situation.
2006-12-06 02:06:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
LIberals have never supported adult-child sex.
The ACLU defended Namblas right to free assembly ONLY.
Again,a conservative hater lies and lies like all hell.
To paraphrase you"Jesus Christ you're a lttle girl",Matt.
2006-12-06 02:14:08 · answer #3 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what you're talking about. I realize you're trying to be inflammatory and get crazy responses, but I am extremely liberal and I would never condone adult-child sex. I don't know of any liberals who would condone such a thing.
You know, the topic of child molestation and rape really isn't funny. If you want to post stupid things and get a rise out of people, please pick a topic that's not so touchy with many people.
2006-12-06 02:01:16 · answer #4 · answered by Elaine 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Using Mark Foley and liberal in the same sentence is like using George Bush and great spokesman together......
2006-12-06 02:06:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't know of ANY liberals who have actually supported pedophilia or the legalization of child pornography. For some reason, though, conservatives sometimes like to convince themselves that we're all NAMBLA supporters. Yet another conservative delusion!
2006-12-06 02:02:18 · answer #6 · answered by tangerine 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
it's time for people like you to move on with life, and quit making up all kinds of false statements. there are good and bad politicians on both sides of the fence. it is a shame that people like you have to live in such a narrow, shallow frame of mind, that you can't see the real facts. bush would be proud of you. (and that is not a compliment)
2006-12-06 02:07:59 · answer #7 · answered by grumpy 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
People that support adult-child sex aren't called liberals they're called psychos. What a moronic question...
2006-12-06 02:00:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
So, you post a personal attack based on an inflammatory subject with no facts or sources to back you up.
You really have no argument of any substance, do you?
2006-12-06 02:03:34 · answer #9 · answered by sparky52881 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I guess I don't have to wonder what the subject is on Rush's show today.
2006-12-06 02:04:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋