English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-05 23:52:18 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

lalu and mulayam both are good but lalu is the good choice if there are no other options available.
lalu is the one for the best performance of indian railway and he can also do same for india.
best of luck !

2006-12-06 03:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

By any yard stick Laloo. Because Laloo is an educated man. Very few people know that he is a Lawyer. Just to keep the power he criminlised the politics in Bihar. At the same time I don't blame just Laloo for this, even the electorate also to be blamed. They wanted that way to be ruled. Laloo can do wonders if he wants to do. The Railway Ministry is the Best example. Nobody had ever dreamt that one the Indian Railways will come out of losses and gain profits. I would say it is the 8th wonder of the world. All the credit goes to Laloo Prasad Yadav. Since he admitted that crinimilzation of Bihar politics was his mistake. We Indians must give Laloo a chance to rule the country and turn around the country from the Western Ghulami thinking to true Desi knowledge. Why can't we drink Nimbu Paani to quench our thrust than drink foreign cola which is full of Pesticides? Because our Congress Bosses want us to drink cola so that they can make tons of money at the cost of the health of our future generations. It's only Laloo can make us drink Nimbu Paani no body else. I would say if given a chance Laloo will prove himself the best PM we ever had.

2006-12-06 00:55:51 · answer #2 · answered by atlantindian 3 · 0 0

It is very unfortunate fate of Indian democracy. That both Laloo and Mulayam were product of historical Jayaprakash Narayana movement in mid-70s. But now they became representatives of caste and criminal politics. However, Iam confident if a chance is given both of them can behave excellent then the present prime minister, who is a prisoner of his choice and work to the dictation of world bank on one side and Sonia Gandhi on another side.

2006-12-06 01:27:05 · answer #3 · answered by naren 3 · 1 0

they have no ability to be a pm of our country first is ms is dacoit he is undamocratic and he is a hitler part2 he is a unsecular and laloo is a extremist he is a clown

2006-12-06 00:54:11 · answer #4 · answered by ricky n 2 · 0 0

in my assessment laloo is the best choice.mulayam has a shadow;amarsingh

2006-12-06 18:09:41 · answer #5 · answered by roaringlion 2 · 1 0

Neither. One will make whole India Bihar & the other will make it Akhara !

2006-12-06 00:18:13 · answer #6 · answered by bisexualmale s 6 · 1 0

r u serious that u want PM between them.
But it is nice joke

2006-12-05 23:56:57 · answer #7 · answered by ANI 2 · 0 0

you are comparing a street dog with a rabid dog

2006-12-06 06:11:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

we can make them joint PM

2006-12-06 03:08:56 · answer #9 · answered by Brahmanda 7 · 0 0

Which country are we talking about....?? ;-)

2006-12-05 23:53:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers