English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If your a woman and you want an abortion - you and the person that made the baby should kill the baby yourselves. They should sell an abortion kill kit...

Only in the west can you be irresponsible and society will offer you a bail out alternative.

Guess what, If you go to IRAQ, IRAN, EGYPT, and other Middle Eastern Countries.. Woman are responsible with their sexuality. American woman have been described before as a bunch a whores that sleep with anything.. Cmments?

2006-12-05 23:04:42 · 9 answers · asked by J S 2 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

9 answers

I agree 100% with you that abortion should be outlawed. 94%-97% takes place because its an easy way out to avoid responsibility. If the female decides to spread her legs, then she should be ready to face the consequences. If you every look at the pro-choice arguments they are really really weak. The only case that is not the mothers fault is rape. Even though she was rape, she shouldn't have the baby executed because of his/her fathers crime. You should be be going after the father because he is the one that raped her. As far as having abortion because of incest, as far as I am concerned you deserve what ever punishment comes to you. You choose incest, it doesn't happen by accident.

2006-12-07 04:57:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

yeah, no more abortions. If a woman is raped, it was probably her fault anyway. If she was really young (13-16), of course she knew fully well what she was doing and it doesn't matter if having a baby will destroy her chances of ever having a good life. And putting up all those unwanted children for adoption- what a great idea! who cares if a large portion go unadopted and end up abused in Foster homes, with a negative attitude towards life or end up on the street. Or, of course, the best thing to do with an unwanted child is to keep it and raise it, no matter if their father runs away and theres not enough money to give the child a good life or the Mother isn't fit to raise children. It's morally right, and there's no argument with what is right. If a woman was stupid enough to get pregnant when her health wont allow for her not to be endanger because of it, it's her own fault. She should go through with it. Even when the abortion happens before the baby even looks remotely human- still wrong. Abortion gives women rights to decide what happens to her body and decide for herself what is right (a decision that will stay with her for the rest of her life)- why would we want to give a woman that? Gosh, next thing you know they'll be voting or something. Damn whorish stupid evil women. Got to put them in their place. No abortion!

2006-12-06 00:17:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You know what? People in the west are responsible to give a birth to a child which is wanted and will have planty of material and emotional needs satisfied.
People in 3rd world give birth to a children which they must than work for parents because parents can't give finantional support to them. Most of them are hungry and without any security. We live in a society which gives to an individual free will to make their own decisions and life.
P.S.: Most people in America are similar to you in the Middle East. Although abortions are not baned, I think, but lots of people are against abortion. In Europe it is different.
Read something written in wikipedia about Romanian regime in the past:
In 1966, the regime decreed a ban on contraception and abortion on demand, and introduced other policies to increase birth rate and fertility rate - including a special tax amounting to between 10 and 20 percent on the incomes of men and women who remained childless after the age of twenty-five, whether married or single. Abortion was permitted only in cases where the woman in question was over 42, or already the mother of four (later five) children. Mothers of at least five children would be entitled to significant benefits, while mothers of at least ten children were declared heroine mothers receiving a gold medal, a free car, free transportation on trains, etc.; few women ever sought this status, the average Romanian family having 2-3 children. Furthermore, a considerable number of women either died or were maimed during clandestine abortions.

The government also targeted rising divorce rates and made divorce much more difficult - it was decreed that a marriage could be dissolved only in exceptional cases. By the late 1960s, the population began to swell, accompanied by rising poverty and increased homelessness (street children) in the urban areas. In turn, a new problem was created by uncontrollable child abandonment, which swelled the orphanage population and facilitated a rampant AIDS epidemic in the late 1980s - created by the regime's refusal to acknowledge the existence of the disease, and its unwillingness to allow for any HIV test to be carried out.[citation needed]

2006-12-05 23:20:55 · answer #3 · answered by nelli 4 · 0 0

OK. And if a man from one of those societies "dishonors" a woman (rapes or even if he has consensual sex with her), he or someone from his tribe can be killed in retaliation. That's because women in those countries are considered property. Western women are free and therefore able to make choices, granted these decisions are not always wise, but it takes 2 to make a baby. Or 1 and a turkey baster, but women who are paying for a frozen pop don't usually end up at the clinic getting scraped. Anyway, you just seem to be looking for a complex way of insulting American women. Unless you are a virgin, then you have every right to judge the sexual morals of others.

2006-12-05 23:17:59 · answer #4 · answered by adrianne 5 · 2 0

You're not taking in to account that a lot of the time it isn't about irresponsibility. Is it irresponsible on the woman's part if she was raped, or something along those lines?

And yes, maybe women are more responsible with sex in other countries, but if your laws told you that sex before marriage, or sex with someone other than your husband could result in death, you'd be more responsible too.
(I know this isn't widespread in the area's you have mentioned, but it does happen in some of these cultures.)

So, next time you have sex, why don't you make sure you're relieving the woman of responsibility and make sure you're packing some kind of birth control!

2006-12-05 23:10:12 · answer #5 · answered by AB 3 · 1 1

your right really i may be an american woman but i do take reasponsibilty for what i do. its not that poor babys falut that your too stupid not to use protection don't kill the poor thing give it up for adoption if your not ready there are soo many ppl that can't have children of their own and are just waiting for one. i think ppl who get abortions are just selfish ppl who only care about themselves. some ppl may say well what about rape victims? still there are plenty of cupples out there that would love to have a child. yes it should be aginst the law to kill your child cuz really that is what it is! Good comment really

2006-12-05 23:14:39 · answer #6 · answered by sarah 5 · 0 1

I see American women are still disappointing you. Not submissive enough for you and they just treat you like a piece of meat!
Not at all like in the far east where you can go and have all the sex you can pay for and not have to worry about tidying up if you make a woman pregnant? Make it in time for the birth of your last unplanned child?

2006-12-05 23:07:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Get off your soap box.
There are many instances when an abortion should be given. Incest, rape, health.....Spew your hate somewhere else, or move if you don't like it.

Educate yourself.

2006-12-05 23:09:13 · answer #8 · answered by Jazzys_mom 5 · 2 1

I love whores.

2006-12-05 23:23:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers