2006-12-05 21:41:33 · 10 answers · asked by Natalie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Because you either need permission from the person or a court order to take DNA from a person. We don't live in a police state yet!
2006-12-05 21:50:52 · answer #1 · answered by Lost and found 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello,
I hope that day never arrives, what I nightmare scenario that would be. YES! and who would control the DNA profile information, and too what end would it be used & why?. Think how much power and control that would give governments.
**Have you ever seen the film "Gattaca" that is the kind of world we would end up living in. No! thanks stop the planet and let me off if that ever happens.
**Its been bad enough with that madman Blunkett (thank goodness he's gone now!!) & Blair. They have a very weird agenda wanting us all to have ID cards just like the pass laws under apartied in the 70's in South Africa (One step removed from a total police state!). No! Thanks this DNA idea should be opposed at all cost and at every stage IMO.
IR
2006-12-06 04:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How generally have I heard "in case you have not something to disguise, why complication?" Is that your thought of an sensible debate on the undertaking? additionally, you fail to describe further how those DNA samples could make it much less confusing to hit upon lacking human beings. You assume that this documents/cloth will continuously be used for sturdy (benign) purposes, that it's going to be saved secure, and not fall into the incorrect hands. Why? What in case you come across out 20 yrs down the line this is getting used against you - it's going to be too previous due. you would be in worry if govt settle on all those poor in the spelling gene could be positioned to dying. in case you acquiesce to this and different lunatic thoughts, we can have not any rights left in this crappy united states.
2016-12-13 03:45:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a small issue of Human Rights going on here. No one really likes the whole big brother syndrome that is plauging the modern world. Sure it would be useful when helping to solve crimes in furture, but that doens't make it right. And what happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
Sometimes it would be useful for me not to have a little sister, but disposing of said little sister would probably not be considered "right".
2006-12-05 21:52:45 · answer #4 · answered by Stookie2 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How do we know what's happening to the umbilical cord? There seems to be no ethical argument against taking the DNA of something classified as medical waste and maybe this is quietly happening right now.
2006-12-06 01:30:56 · answer #5 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because its not - and I hope that day NEVER comes. There is no database so safe that they could'nt guarantee a babies details getting into the wrong hands - I wouldnt want to take that risk.
2006-12-05 21:59:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its expensive to do. You need to store it in cryogenic containers. Besides, if you want some of their DNA you could get it anytime... from them... unless you are referring to an abduction?
2006-12-05 21:46:57 · answer #7 · answered by Paul H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont know, but it would surely solve a lot of crime in years to come, when the babies of today are commiting crime! makes too much sense i suppose for this country
2006-12-05 22:11:38 · answer #8 · answered by button moon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rest assured, it will be common practice in the future.
2006-12-05 22:38:14 · answer #9 · answered by A True Gentleman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom !!!!
2006-12-05 23:56:44 · answer #10 · answered by wombat2u2004 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋