English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Well unfortunately (and fortunately), yes. The allegedly responsible people have to be tried under the legal system, within the due processes of law and until the court pronounces them guilty, they can walk free. This is unfortunate because it is taking a rather long time (and perhaps will take more time). But on a subject as sensitive as communal harmony (disharmony) in India, this checks undue/hasty sentencing/persecution etc. Since the subject is one on which sentiments run high (and critical thinking low), it is only fair that the court should take it's time in processing the evidence (which is bound to be complicated and myriad). However something i personally find a little incomprehensible is why some of the politicians who were allegedle hand in glove in the event were re-elected by the Indian polity. To my mind that either indicates that we as voters are not convinced that they were guilty (which is fine, but then lets not crib about the courts not sentencing them) else, we all suffer from a remarkably short colelctive memory and forget all about the event while we vote on issues like liberalisation, pay commissions, dearness allowances which are closer to our current lives.

2006-12-06 10:39:44 · answer #1 · answered by fly 2 · 0 0

If anybody to be found fault for demoliton, that was VP Singh and PV Narasimha Rao, who plaed with fire, with out making use avenues available for a permanent solution. Only their behaviour and vote bank politics made Karasevaks restless, The so called leaders like LK Advani, against whome cases were registered, are only silent spectators, who do not have any say in what happend. If the government, courts and political parties failed to settle an issuce for over six decades, how can one expect the peole to be silent ?

2006-12-09 17:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by naren 3 · 0 0

Its been some 500 years since Ram Janm Bhumi was destroyed. Thousands of dead people who tried to fight for it from time to time. Gazni Mohammed had looted Somnath Temple, Aurangzeb built the mosques by demolishing the temples in Kashi and Mathura, he collected jizya.

Darling Ye hai India. Otherwise in which country , the majority is goimng to tolerate that their temples are turned into Mosques and they just sit and watch. Even after 50 years of independence all they are asking is that there most important temples should be given back. Just 3 out of more than 3000 temples. Is it too much to ask?

A few months ago in Lahaur they pulled down a temple. Recently in Kajakhistan they not only destroyed temples but Hindus were thrown away from their houses unless they declare themselves as non Hindus.

I dont think you are much concerned about them being homeless in cold winter season.

" I have seen stones and columns of Hindu temples incorporated into the architecture of several mosques, including the Jama Masjid and Ahmed Shah Masjid in Ahmedabad; the mosque in the Uparkot fort of Junagadh (Gujarat) and in Vidisha (near Bhopal); the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra right next to the famous dargah in Ajmer-and the currently controversial Bhojshala "mosque" in Dhar (near Indore).

Hindu culture was at its imaginative best and vigorously creative when the severely-allergic-to-images Muslims entered Hindustan. Islamic invaders did not just destroy countless temples and constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices; damaged the pristine vigor of Hindu religion, prevented the intensification of Hindu culture, debilitating it permanently, stopped the development of Hindu arts ended the creative impulse in all realms of thought and action, damaged the people's cultural pride, disrupted the transmission of values and wisdom, cultural practices and tradition from one generation to the next; destroyed the proper historical evolution of Hindu kingdoms and society, affected severely the acquisition of knowledge, research and reflection and violated the moral basis of Hindu society. The Hindus suffered immense psychic damage. The Muslims also plundered the wealth of the Hindu kingdoms, impoverished the Hindu populace, and destroyed the prosperity of Hindustan."

" Gaze in wonder at the Kailas Mandir in the Ellora caves and remember that it is carved out of a solid stone hill, an effort that (inscriptions say) took nearly 200 years. This is art as devotion. The temple built by the Rashtrakuta kings (who also built the colossal sculpture in the Elenhanta caves off Mumbai harbour) gives proof of the ancient Hindus' religious fervor.

The descendants of those who built the magnificent temples of Bhojpur and Thanjavur, Konark and Kailas, invented mathematics and brain surgery, created mindbody disciplines (yoga) of astonishing power, and built mighty empires would almost certainly have attained technological superiority over Europe.

It is not just for "political reasons" that Hindus want to build grand temples at the sites of the (wrecked) Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, and the Mathura idgah. The efforts of religion-intoxicated and politically active Hindus to rebuild the Ram Mandir, the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir, and the Krishna Mandir are just three episodes m a one-thousand year long Hindu struggle to reclaim their culture and religion from alien invaders.

The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 was just one episode in the millennial struggle of the Hindus to repossess their religion-centered culture and nation. Meanwhile, hundreds of ancient Hindu temples forsaken all over Hindustan await the reawakening of Hindu cultural pride to be repaired or rebuilt and restored to their original, ancient glory. "

(source: What the invaders really did - By Rizwan Salim - hindustantimes.com - December 28, 1997). For more on Rizwan Salim, refer to chapter on Quotes and Hindu Art.

V S Naipaul has remarked:

"The converted Muslims of India are denying their past. They do not want to acknowledge a history beyond the time they assumed their new identity. This is almost as bad as Indians not knowing their history,"

Yes Darling ye hai India.

2006-12-06 15:54:26 · answer #3 · answered by rian30 6 · 0 0

So?
who is to be blamed? Judiciary or the culprits?

2006-12-06 22:28:35 · answer #4 · answered by Ashok Chavda 3 · 0 0

that was only ancient monument not mosque , that was never prayer place for muslims . ,karsevek removed black dot from hindus astha .

2006-12-05 21:17:23 · answer #5 · answered by prithvi 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers